Li Xu, Yin Lu, Chen Zhao-Yu, Zhu Lian, Wang Hai-Li, Chen Wei, Yang Guang, Zhang Ying-Ze
Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Aug;24(6):973-86. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1278-y. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
Although tourniquets are widely used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the effectiveness and safety are still in controversy. We therefore conducted an updated meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of tourniquet-assisted to non-tourniquet-assisted TKA and provide recommendations for using tourniquet in TKA.
A systematic search of studies published through March 2013 was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, and ScienceDirect. Randomized, controlled trials that assessed the influence of the use of a tourniquet in TKA and provided data on safety and clinical effects were identified. Demographic characteristics, adverse events, and clinical outcomes were manually extracted from all of the selected studies. The evidence quality levels and recommendations were assessed using the GRADE system.
Fifteen studies encompassing 804 patients and comparing TKA with and without the use of a tourniquet met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the result of meta-analysis indicated that using a tourniquet could decrease the intraoperative blood loss but could increase the postoperative blood loss. However, there was no statistically significant difference in calculated blood loss and measured total blood loss between the tourniquet and non-tourniquet group. There was no statistically significant difference in operation time. Patients treated with a tourniquet might not have higher risks of thromboembolic complications, such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism. The overall GRADE system evidence quality was very low, which lowers our confidence in their recommendations.
As a safe application, the use of a tourniquet during TKA may be effective for reducing intraoperative blood loss, but not for reducing the postoperative blood loss and actual total blood loss. However, no uniform guideline can be made based on the current evidence because of the very low evidence quality and lower GRADE recommendation strength.
尽管止血带在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中被广泛使用,但其有效性和安全性仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了一项更新的荟萃分析,以比较使用止血带与不使用止血带的TKA的结果,并为TKA中止血带的使用提供建议。
使用MEDLINE、EMBASE、OVID和ScienceDirect对截至2013年3月发表的研究进行系统检索。确定评估止血带在TKA中使用的影响并提供安全性和临床效果数据的随机对照试验。从所有选定的研究中手动提取人口统计学特征、不良事件和临床结果。使用GRADE系统评估证据质量水平和建议。
15项研究共纳入804例患者,比较了使用和不使用止血带的TKA,符合纳入标准。总体而言,荟萃分析结果表明,使用止血带可减少术中失血,但会增加术后失血。然而,止血带组和非止血带组在计算失血和测量的总失血量方面无统计学显著差异。手术时间也无统计学显著差异。使用止血带治疗的患者发生血栓栓塞并发症(如深静脉血栓形成和肺血栓栓塞)的风险可能并不更高。总体GRADE系统证据质量非常低,这降低了我们对其建议的信心。
作为一种安全的应用,TKA期间使用止血带可能对减少术中失血有效,但对减少术后失血和实际总失血量无效。然而,由于证据质量非常低且GRADE推荐强度较低,无法根据当前证据制定统一的指南。