Haskins Robin, Henderson Judith M, Bogduk Nikolai
Royal Newcastle Centre, Locked Bag 664J, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia.
Newcastle Bone and Joint Institute, Locked Bag 664J, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia.
Aust J Prim Health. 2014;20(3):305-10. doi: 10.1071/PY13064.
The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) referred for orthopaedic consultation at a large Australian public hospital reported using conservative management strategies as recommended by current practice guidelines. A therapist-assisted questionnaire was employed within the context of a standard physiotherapy assessment in a consecutive cohort of patients with hip or knee OA. Two hundred and two patients with hip or knee OA comprised the included sample. Thirty-nine percent (n=79) reported having only previously consulted their general practitioner. Only 20% (n=41) felt that they had been sufficiently educated about the diagnosis, their treatment options and prognosis. Thirty-three percent (n=66) had not previously engaged in any non-pharmacological management strategy considered a core clinical practice guideline recommendation. The findings of this study suggest that several inconsistencies may exist between current Australian clinical practice and OA clinical guideline recommendations. Identification of the barriers to the use of conservative management requires timely investigation coupled with a national implementation framework to support the translation of guideline recommendations into practice.
本研究的目的是确定在一家大型澳大利亚公立医院接受骨科会诊的髋膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者报告采用当前实践指南所推荐的保守治疗策略的程度。在对连续队列的髋或膝OA患者进行标准物理治疗评估的背景下,采用了治疗师协助的问卷调查。202例髋或膝OA患者构成了纳入样本。39%(n = 79)报告称之前仅咨询过他们的全科医生。只有20%(n = 41)的人认为他们已就诊断、治疗选择和预后接受了充分的教育。33%(n = 66)的人之前未采用过任何被视为核心临床实践指南推荐的非药物治疗策略。本研究结果表明,当前澳大利亚的临床实践与OA临床指南推荐之间可能存在若干不一致之处。识别保守治疗使用的障碍需要及时进行调查,并辅以国家实施框架,以支持将指南推荐转化为实践。