Basildon Child and Family Consultation Service, SEPT, Basildon, UK.
Br J Clin Psychol. 2013 Sep;52(3):249-68. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12012. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
To develop a valid and reliable measure of the supervisory relationship (SR) from the perspective of the supervisor.
A cross-sectional self-report questionnaire design was used with a repeated component for a subsample.
Qualitative data from a previous study of the SR (collected by interviews with supervisors) were used to construct an 89-item self-report questionnaire measure (Supervisory Relationship Measure [SRM]). This was administered to 267 clinical psychology supervisors involved in supervising UK trainee clinical psychologists. One hundred and thirty-four participants completed the measure a second time to establish its test-retest reliability.
Principal components analysis was used. Five factors were identified and labelled 'safe base', 'supervisor commitment', 'trainee contribution', 'external influences', and 'supervisor investment'. Fifty-one items (comprising five subscales based on the factors identified) were selected for the final measure. Analyses revealed the SRM to have good internal consistency, good test-retest reliability, and good construct (convergent and divergent) validity. A preliminary test of predictive (statistical) validity (supervisor satisfaction with the relationship and trainee competence as perceived by the supervisor) yielded promising results.
The SRM is a valid and reliable measure of the SR from the supervisor perspective. It predicts supervisor satisfaction and preliminary evidence suggests that it may also predict trainee competence (as perceived by the supervisor). The findings are consistent with current theory on the SR. The SRM is, therefore, a promising tool for use in research, clinical, and training settings.
The supervisory relationship measure (SRM) is a new psychometrically sound measure of the supervisory relationship (SR) with clinical and research uses. Clinically, it is a useful and structured way for supervisors to provide constructive feedback to their trainees. It can be used in conjunction with the Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ) (completed by the supervisee) to support a dyadic discussion about clinical supervision. Currently the measure is only validated on Clinical Psychology trainees and should be used with caution with qualified staff and other professional groups. Participants were predominantly white British supervisors who chose to take part in an internet-based study and thus the sample may not be fully representative of the population.
从主管的角度出发，开发一种有效的、可靠的监督关系（SR）衡量标准。
采用横断面自我报告问卷设计，并对样本进行重复成分设计。
使用先前对监督关系（通过与主管的访谈收集）的研究的定性数据来构建一个 89 项自我报告问卷衡量标准（监督关系衡量标准[SRM]）。该衡量标准被用于 267 名参与监督英国受训临床心理学家的临床心理学主管。134 名参与者第二次完成该衡量标准，以建立其测试-重测信度。
采用主成分分析。确定了五个因素，并分别命名为“安全基础”、“主管承诺”、“学员贡献”、“外部影响”和“主管投资”。最终衡量标准选择了 51 项（基于确定的因素组成五个子量表）。分析表明，SRM 具有良好的内部一致性、良好的测试-重测信度以及良好的构建（收敛和发散）有效性。对预测（统计）有效性（主管对关系的满意度和主管感知到的学员能力）的初步测试产生了有希望的结果。
SRM 是一种从主管角度衡量监督关系的有效且可靠的衡量标准。它可以预测主管的满意度，初步证据表明它也可以预测主管感知到的学员能力。这些结果与当前的监督关系理论一致。因此，SRM 是一种在研究、临床和培训环境中很有前途的工具。
监督关系衡量标准（SRM）是一种新的、心理测量学上可靠的监督关系（SR）衡量标准，具有临床和研究用途。从临床角度来看，它是主管为学员提供建设性反馈的有用且结构化的方式。它可以与监督关系问卷（由学员完成）一起使用，以支持关于临床监督的二元讨论。目前，该衡量标准仅在临床心理学学员中进行了验证，应谨慎用于合格员工和其他专业群体。参与者主要是选择参加基于互联网的研究的白种英国主管，因此样本可能不完全代表人群。
