Suppr超能文献

联合环形多电极导管和逐点消融优于单纯逐点消融在消除心房颤动方面。

Combined circular multielectrode catheter and point-by-point ablation is superior to point-by-point ablation alone in eliminating atrial fibrillation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):3721-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.016. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Besides conventional point-by-point ablation, novel multielectrode catheters emerge for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to evaluate the clinical utility of a pulmonary vein (PV) isolation approach combining the advantages of both technologies.

METHODS

The study included 240 consecutive AF patients (60±11 years, 68% males, 62% paroxysmal). In the combined ablation group (n=120), PV isolation was performed with a circular multielectrode catheter (PVAC, Medtronic Ablation Frontiers) and completed by conventional point-by-point ablation (NaviStar ThermoCool Catheter, Lasso/CARTO technology, Biosense Webster). In the point-by-point ablation group (n=120), PV isolation was performed with point-by-point ablation alone.

RESULTS

Complete 1-year ablation success (freedom from any atrial arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs) was more frequently observed in the combined ablation group (58.0% versus 43.3%, hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.48, p=0.004). Also clinical success (≥90% reduction of arrhythmia burden on/off antiarrhythmic drugs) was significantly associated with the combined ablation approach (p=0.001). These associations remained significant after multivariable adjustment (both p≤0.005) and were not dependent on the type of AF. The rate of major adverse events (3.3% versus 2.5%) and the procedure time did not differ between groups. The fluoroscopy time, however, was significantly shorter in the combined ablation group (p<0.001) reflecting the reduced need for radiation during multielectrode catheter ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined PV isolation approach based on multielectrode catheter ablation and complementary point-by-point ablation is superior to point-by-point ablation alone and reveals to be safe. A potential explanation for these findings is the improved durability of ablation lesion after the combined ablation approach.

摘要

背景

除了常规的点对点消融外,新型多电极导管也应用于房颤(AF)消融。我们旨在评估结合两种技术优势的肺静脉(PV)隔离方法的临床应用价值。

方法

这项研究纳入了 240 例连续的房颤患者(60±11 岁,男性占 68%,阵发性占 62%)。在联合消融组(n=120)中,使用环形多电极导管(PVAC,Medtronic Ablation Frontiers)进行 PV 隔离,并通过常规的点对点消融(NaviStar ThermoCool 导管、Lasso/CARTO 技术、Biosense Webster)完成。在点对点消融组(n=120)中,仅采用点对点消融进行 PV 隔离。

结果

联合消融组中 1 年完全消融成功率(无任何抗心律失常药物的房性心律失常)更高(58.0%比 43.3%,风险比 1.72,95%置信区间 1.19-2.48,p=0.004)。此外,临床成功率(抗心律失常药物治疗和不治疗时心律失常负荷减少≥90%)也与联合消融方法显著相关(p=0.001)。在多变量调整后,这些相关性仍然显著(均 p≤0.005),且不依赖于房颤类型。主要不良事件发生率(3.3%比 2.5%)和手术时间在两组之间无差异。然而,联合消融组的透视时间明显缩短(p<0.001),这反映了在多电极导管消融期间辐射需求减少。

结论

基于多电极导管消融和补充性点对点消融的联合 PV 隔离方法优于单纯的点对点消融,且安全。这些发现的一个可能解释是联合消融方法后消融损伤的耐久性提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验