Research Fellow, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Norway PhD Candidate, The School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, United Kingdom.
Disasters. 2013 Oct;37 Suppl 2:S171-87. doi: 10.1111/disa.12020. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
This paper looks at the three-way relationship between the Government of Chad, humanitarians, and the United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic and Chad (MINURCAT) from 2004 until June 2011. Chad was never comfortable with the international presence of either humanitarians or peacekeepers and asserted its sovereignty increasingly during this period. MINURCAT was deployed in 2008 to protect humanitarian workers and to facilitate the provision of humanitarian assistance in eastern Chad. This association between the UN mission and humanitarian agencies contributed to making the latter the target of repressive practices by the government, such as the imposition of armed escorts. Facing a steep learning curve, Chad and its state officials gradually appropriated the discourse of the humanitarian and international community and ultimately, in 2010, requested the departure of MINURCAT, claiming that they could meet the protection needs of vulnerable populations in eastern Chad on their own.
本文审视了 2004 年至 2011 年 6 月期间乍得政府、人道主义者和联合国中非共和国和乍得特派团(中乍特派团)之间的三方关系。乍得一直对人道主义者或维和人员的国际存在感到不满,并在此期间越来越多地维护其主权。中乍特派团于 2008 年部署,以保护人道主义工作者并促进在乍得东部提供人道主义援助。联合国特派团与人道主义机构之间的这种联系导致后者成为政府镇压行为的目标,例如强制配备武装护送。乍得及其国家官员面临陡峭的学习曲线,逐渐采用了人道主义和国际社会的话语,最终在 2010 年要求中乍特派团离开,声称他们能够自行满足乍得东部弱势人群的保护需求。