Department of Cardiology, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Korean Circ J. 2013 Jun;43(6):384-90. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2013.43.6.384. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is an important non-invasive imaging method for evaluating ischemia. However, wall motion interpretation can be impaired by the experience level of the interpreter and the subjectivity of the visual assessment. In our study we aimed to combine DSE and tissue syncronisation imaging to increase sensitivity for detecting ischemia.
50 patients with indications for DSE were included in the study. In 25 patients we found DSE positive for ischemia and in the other 25 patients we found it to be negative. The negative group was accepted as the control group. There was no significant difference in terms of risk factors and echocardiographic parameters between the two groups, except for wall motion scores. In both groups, left ventricular dyssychrony was accepted as the difference between time to peak systolic velocity (Ts) in the reciprocal four couple of non-apical segments at rest and during peak stress. Timings were corrected for heart rate. We compared the differences of the dyssynchronisation value at rest and during peak stress to determine the distinctions within the groups and between the groups of DSE positive and negative patients.
We found that stress and ischemia did not create any significant difference over the left intraventricular dyssynchrony with DSE, although at the segmenter level it prolonged the time to peak systolic velocity (p<0.05). These alterations did not show any significant difference between positive and negative DSE groups.
As a result, this segmenter dyssynchrony and the time to peak systolic velocity, which is corrected for heart rate, did not enhance any new value over DSE for detecting ischemia.
多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)是评估缺血的重要非侵入性成像方法。然而,壁运动的解释可能会受到解释者的经验水平和视觉评估的主观性的影响。在我们的研究中,我们旨在结合 DSE 和组织同步成像来提高检测缺血的灵敏度。
本研究纳入了 50 例有 DSE 适应证的患者。在 25 例患者中,我们发现 DSE 对缺血呈阳性,在另外 25 例患者中,我们发现 DSE 对缺血呈阴性。阴性组被接受为对照组。两组之间,除了壁运动评分外,在危险因素和超声心动图参数方面没有显著差异。在两组中,左心室不同步被认为是静息和峰值负荷时反向四个非心尖节段的收缩期速度峰值时间(Ts)之间的差异。时间被校正为心率。我们比较了静息和峰值负荷时的不同步值差异,以确定组内和 DSE 阳性和阴性患者组之间的区别。
我们发现,尽管在节段水平上延长了收缩期速度峰值时间(p<0.05),但 DSE 对左室内不同步并没有产生明显的差异。这些改变在 DSE 阳性和阴性组之间没有显示出任何显著差异。
因此,这种节段性不同步和校正心率的收缩期速度峰值时间,在检测缺血方面,并没有为 DSE 提供任何新的价值。