Suppr超能文献

在一项多实验室比较研究中,病毒和噬菌体在粪便来源确定方面的性能。

Performance of viruses and bacteriophages for fecal source determination in a multi-laboratory, comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.

出版信息

Water Res. 2013 Nov 15;47(18):6929-43. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.064. Epub 2013 Jul 4.

Abstract

An inter-laboratory study of the accuracy of microbial source tracking (MST) methods was conducted using challenge fecal and sewage samples that were spiked into artificial freshwater and provided as unknowns (blind test samples) to the laboratories. The results of the Source Identification Protocol Project (SIPP) are presented in a series of papers that cover 41 MST methods. This contribution details the results of the virus and bacteriophage methods targeting human fecal or sewage contamination. Human viruses used as source identifiers included adenoviruses (HAdV), enteroviruses (EV), norovirus Groups I and II (NoVI and NoVII), and polyomaviruses (HPyVs). Bacteriophages were also employed, including somatic coliphages and F-specific RNA bacteriophages (FRNAPH) as general indicators of fecal contamination. Bacteriophage methods targeting human fecal sources included genotyping of FRNAPH isolates and plaque formation on bacterial hosts Enterococcus faecium MB-55, Bacteroides HB-73 and Bacteroides GB-124. The use of small sample volumes (≤50 ml) resulted in relatively insensitive theoretical limits of detection (10-50 gene copies or plaques × 50 ml(-1)) which, coupled with low virus concentrations in samples, resulted in high false-negative rates, low sensitivity, and low negative predictive values. On the other hand, the specificity of the human virus methods was generally close to 100% and positive predictive values were ∼40-70% with the exception of NoVs, which were not detected. The bacteriophage methods were generally much less specific toward human sewage than virus methods, although FRNAPH II genotyping was relatively successful, with 18% sensitivity and 85% specificity. While the specificity of the human virus methods engenders great confidence in a positive result, better concentration methods and larger sample volumes must be utilized for greater accuracy of negative results, i.e. the prediction that a human contamination source is absent.

摘要

进行了一项微生物源追踪(MST)方法准确性的实验室间研究,使用挑战粪便和污水样本,将其掺入人工淡水中,并作为未知物(盲样测试样本)提供给实验室。源识别协议项目(SIPP)的结果在一系列论文中呈现,涵盖了 41 种 MST 方法。本贡献详细介绍了针对人类粪便或污水污染的病毒和噬菌体方法的结果。用作源标识符的人类病毒包括腺病毒(HAdV)、肠病毒(EV)、诺如病毒组 I 和 II(NoVI 和 NoVII)和多瘤病毒(HPyV)。还使用了噬菌体,包括作为粪便污染一般指示物的体细胞噬菌体和 F 型 RNA 噬菌体(FRNAPH)。针对人类粪便源的噬菌体方法包括 FRNAPH 分离株的基因分型和细菌宿主肠球菌 MB-55、拟杆菌 HB-73 和拟杆菌 GB-124 上的噬菌斑形成。使用小样本量(≤50ml)导致相对不敏感的理论检测限(10-50 个基因拷贝或噬菌斑×50ml(-1)),再加上样本中病毒浓度低,导致高假阴性率、低灵敏度和低阴性预测值。另一方面,人类病毒方法的特异性通常接近 100%,阳性预测值约为 40-70%,除了未检测到的诺如病毒。噬菌体方法对人类污水的特异性通常远低于病毒方法,尽管 FRNAPH II 基因分型相对成功,灵敏度为 18%,特异性为 85%。虽然人类病毒方法的特异性使阳性结果具有很大的置信度,但必须使用更好的浓缩方法和更大的样本量来提高阴性结果的准确性,即预测不存在人类污染源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验