Department of Anesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Rm M3200, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada,
Can J Anaesth. 2013 Oct;60(10):1013-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-0006-8. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
Previous studies discussing the risk of medical misconduct amongst anesthesiologists differ in their conclusions. In Canada, there is a paucity of data regarding demographic information, disciplinary findings, and penalties received by anesthesiologists. The aim of this study was to identify potential characteristics for discipline within the specialty of anesthesiology by ascertaining disciplinary findings and types of penalties received by anesthesiologists and comparing these with cases of disciplinary action against other Canadian physicians.
Using a retrospective cohort design, we constructed a database of all Canadian physicians disciplined by their respective provincial and territorial regulatory colleges between 2000-2011. We collected and compared physician demographic information, types of disciplinary findings, and penalties received by anesthesiologists and other physicians during that time period.
Between 2000-2011, various physicians were disciplined 721 times in Canada. Nine anesthesiologists were found guilty of 11 (1.5%) disciplinary findings. One anesthesiologist was disciplined three separate times. All anesthesiologists subject to discipline were males, ten (90.9%) were independent practitioners, and almost two-thirds (63.6%) were international medical graduates. The most common types of disciplinary findings were related to standard of care issues, inappropriate prescribing, and fraudulent behaviour. Anesthesiologists appeared less likely than other physicians to be disciplined for sexual misconduct and unprofessional behaviour.
Anesthesiologists in Canada have been subject to low rates of disciplinary action. Specifically, there have been low rates of sexual misconduct and unprofessional behaviour. Interventions to reduce disciplinary findings in anesthesiology could be directed toward bolstering education relating to standard of care issues, prescribing practices, and fraudulent behaviour.
之前关于麻醉师医疗不当行为风险的研究结论存在差异。在加拿大,关于麻醉师的人口统计学信息、纪律处分结果和所受处罚的数据很少。本研究的目的是通过确定麻醉师的纪律处分结果和所受处罚类型,确定麻醉学专业内的潜在纪律处分特征,并将这些结果与对其他加拿大医生的纪律处分案例进行比较。
使用回顾性队列设计,我们构建了一个数据库,其中包含 2000 年至 2011 年间,由各自的省级和地区监管学院纪律处分的所有加拿大医生。我们收集并比较了在此期间麻醉师和其他医生的医生人口统计学信息、纪律处分结果和所受处罚类型。
2000 年至 2011 年期间,加拿大共有 721 名不同的医生受到纪律处分。9 名麻醉师被发现犯有 11 项(1.5%)纪律处分。一名麻醉师被纪律处分了三次。所有受到纪律处分的麻醉师均为男性,10 名(90.9%)为独立从业者,近三分之二(63.6%)为国际医学毕业生。最常见的纪律处分结果与护理标准问题、不当处方和欺诈行为有关。与性不端和不专业行为相比,麻醉师受到纪律处分的可能性似乎较低。
加拿大的麻醉师受到纪律处分的情况很少。特别是,性不端和不专业行为的发生率很低。减少麻醉学纪律处分的干预措施可以针对加强与护理标准问题、处方实践和欺诈行为有关的教育。