Incavo S J, Difazio F, Wilder D
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1990 Nov;5(4):236-8. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(90)90007-S.
This study examined the load to failure ratio and stiffness of eight different cerclage techniques commonly used in the clinical management of fractures. For a single-loop cerclage, titanium cable was the strongest, while stainless steel wire secured with a commercial tightener was the weakest (P < 0.05). When a single-loop configuration is necessary (i.e. trochanteric attachment) a cable system is superior to cerclage wiring. A double-wrap of either cable or wire was considerably stronger than any single-wrap cerclage technique and stronger than two cerclage wires (P < 0.05).
本研究检测了骨折临床治疗中常用的八种不同环扎技术的失效负荷比和刚度。对于单环扎,钛缆最强,而用商用收紧器固定的不锈钢丝最弱(P<0.05)。当需要单环配置时(即转子附着处),缆索系统优于环扎钢丝。缆索或钢丝的双缠绕比任何单缠绕环扎技术都要强得多,且比两根环扎钢丝更强(P<0.05)。