• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after living-donor liver transplantation.供体肝移植后肝细胞肝癌患者的临床结局。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 7;19(29):4737-44. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4737.
2
Younger age and presence of macrovascular invasion were independent significant factors associated with poor disease-free survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation.在接受活体肝移植的肝细胞癌患者中,较年轻的年龄和存在大血管侵犯是与无病生存期不佳相关的独立显著因素。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Mar;44(2):516-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.01.032.
3
Pilot study of living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding Milan Criteria (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer extended criteria).米兰标准(巴塞罗那临床肝癌扩展标准)以外肝癌患者的亲体肝移植的初步研究。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Mar;24(3):369-379. doi: 10.1002/lt.24977.
4
Effects of loco regional treatments before living donor liver transplantation on overall survival and recurrence-free survival in South Korean patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.活体肝移植前局部区域治疗对韩国肝细胞癌患者总生存期和无复发生存期的影响。
HPB (Oxford). 2016 Jan;18(1):98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
5
Section 5. Further expanding the criteria for HCC in living donor liver transplantation: when not to transplant: SNUH experience.第 5 节:进一步扩大活体肝移植中 HCC 的标准:何时不移植:SNUH 经验。
Transplantation. 2014 Apr 27;97 Suppl 8:S20-3. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000446269.20934.d3.
6
Living-donor liver transplantation associated with higher incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence than deceased-donor liver transplantation.活体供肝移植与死亡供肝移植相比,肝癌复发率更高。
Transplantation. 2014 Jan 15;97(1):71-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a68953.
7
AFP level and histologic differentiation predict the survival of patients with liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.甲胎蛋白水平和组织学分化可预测肝癌患者肝移植的生存率。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2012 Jun;11(3):256-61. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(12)60157-x.
8
Living donor liver transplantation does not increase tumor recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma compared to deceased donor transplantation.与尸体供肝移植相比,活体供肝移植不会增加肝细胞癌的肿瘤复发率。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 21;20(31):10953-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i31.10953.
9
Combination of FDG-PET and UCSF Criteria for Predicting HCC Recurrence After Living Donor Liver Transplantation.18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)与加州大学旧金山分校(UCSF)标准相结合预测活体肝移植术后肝癌复发
Transplantation. 2016 Sep;100(9):1925-32. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001297.
10
Comparison between living donor liver transplantation recipients who met the Milan and UCSF criteria after successful downstaging therapies.比较成功降期治疗后符合米兰和旧金山标准的活体供肝移植受者。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Nov;16(11):2120-5. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2019-y. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Surgical Management and Evolving Therapies.肝细胞癌:手术治疗与不断发展的治疗策略。
Cancer Treat Res. 2024;192:185-206. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-61238-1_10.
2
Current role and perspectives of living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review of the past 20 years.活体肝移植治疗肝细胞癌的当前作用与展望:过去20年的系统评价
Updates Surg. 2024 May 4. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01862-y.
3
Management of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: challenges and strategies for optimal outcomes.早期肝细胞癌的管理:实现最佳治疗效果的挑战与策略
J Liver Cancer. 2023 Sep;23(2):300-315. doi: 10.17998/jlc.2023.08.27. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
4
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.《2022年韩国肝脏癌协会-韩国国立癌症中心肝细胞癌管理实践指南》
J Liver Cancer. 2023 Mar;23(1):1-120. doi: 10.17998/jlc.2022.11.07. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
5
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.2022KLCA-NCC 韩国肝细胞癌管理实践指南。
Korean J Radiol. 2022 Dec;23(12):1126-1240. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0822.
6
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.2022 KLCA-NCC 韩国肝细胞癌管理实践指南。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022 Oct;28(4):583-705. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0294. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
7
Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: outcome of expanded criteria in tumor size.米兰标准以外的肝癌患者的活体肝移植:肿瘤大小扩展标准的结果。
BMC Surg. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01403-z.
8
Hepatocellular cancer selection systems and liver transplantation: from the tower of babel to an ideal comprehensive score.肝细胞癌选择系统与肝移植:从巴别塔到理想的综合评分。
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1599-1614. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01078-4. Epub 2021 May 18.
9
Comparison between Milan and UCSF criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肝细胞癌患者肝移植米兰标准与加州大学旧金山分校标准的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan 5;6:11. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2020.01.06. eCollection 2021.
10
Prediction of Early Recurrence of Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.预测肝移植术后单发肝细胞癌的早期复发。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 1;9(1):15855. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52427-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.活体供肝移植与死体供肝移植治疗肝细胞癌的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Liver Transpl. 2012 Oct;18(10):1226-36. doi: 10.1002/lt.23490.
2
Evaluation of the new AJCC staging system for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma.可切除肝细胞癌新 AJCC 分期系统的评估。
World J Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep 30;9:114. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-114.
3
Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging and transplant survival benefit for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre, cohort study.巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期和肝移植对肝细胞癌患者的生存获益:一项多中心队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jul;12(7):654-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70144-9. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
4
Impact of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin and tumor size on the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after living donor liver transplantation.去γ-羧基凝血酶原和肿瘤大小对活体肝移植后肝细胞癌复发的影响
Transplantation. 2009 Feb 27;87(4):531-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181943bee.
5
Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis.预测米兰标准以外的肝细胞癌患者肝移植后的生存率:一项回顾性探索性分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70284-5. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
6
Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Tokyo University series.活体供肝肝移植治疗肝细胞癌:东京大学系列研究
Dig Dis. 2007;25(4):310-2. doi: 10.1159/000106910.
7
Living donor liver transplantation for patients with HCC exceeding the Milan criteria: a proposal of expanded criteria.针对超出米兰标准的肝癌患者的活体供肝肝移植:扩大标准的提议。
Dig Dis. 2007;25(4):299-302. doi: 10.1159/000106908.
8
Tumor recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: recurrence pathway and prognostic factors.肝细胞癌肝移植术后肿瘤复发:复发途径及预后因素
Transplant Proc. 2007 Sep;39(7):2304-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.06.059.
9
Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence and death following living and deceased donor liver transplantation.活体和尸体供肝肝移植后的肝细胞癌复发与死亡
Am J Transplant. 2007 Jun;7(6):1601-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01802.x.
10
Living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation for early irresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.活体供体与尸体供体肝移植治疗早期不可切除肝细胞癌
Br J Surg. 2007 Jan;94(1):78-86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5528.

供体肝移植后肝细胞肝癌患者的临床结局。

Clinical outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after living-donor liver transplantation.

机构信息

Hepatobiliary-Pancreas Surgery and Liver Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, South Korea.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 7;19(29):4737-44. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4737.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4737
PMID:23922471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3732846/
Abstract

AIM

To investigate risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and efficacy of various criteria.

METHODS

From October 2000 to November 2011, 233 adult patients underwent LDLT for HCC at our institution. After excluding nine postoperative mortality cases, we analyzed retrospectively 224 patients. To identify risk factors for recurrence, we evaluated recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) rate, survival rate, and various other factors which are based on the characteristics of both the patient and tumor. Additionally, we developed our own criteria based on our data. Next, we compared our selection criteria with various tumor-grading scales, such as the Milan criteria, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, TNM stage, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage and Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) scoring system. The median follow up was 68 (6-139) mo.

RESULTS

In 224 patients who received LDLT for HCC, 37 (16.5%) experienced tumor recurrence during the follow-up period. The 5-year DFS and overall survival rates after LDLT in all patients with HCC were 80.9% and 76.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the tumor diameter {5 cm; P < 0.001; exponentiation of the B coefficient [Exp(B)], 11.89; 95%CI: 3.784-37.368} and alpha fetoprotein level [AFP, 100 ng/mL; P = 0.021; Exp(B), 2.892; 95%CI: 1.172-7.132] had significant influences on HCC recurrence after LDLT. Therefore, these two factors were included in our criteria. Based on these data, we set our selection criteria as a tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm and AFP ≤ 100 ng/mL. Within our new criteria (140/214, 65.4%), the 5-year DFS and overall survival rates were 88.6% and 81.8%, respectively. Our criteria (P = 0.001), Milan criteria (P = 0.009), and UCSF criteria (P = 0.001) showed a significant difference in DFS rate. And our criteria (P = 0.006) and UCSF criteria (P = 0.009) showed a significant difference in overall survival rate. But Milan criteria did not show significant difference in overall survival rate (P = 0.137). Among stages 0, A, B and C of BCLC, stage C had a significantly higher recurrence rate (P = 0.001), lower DFS (P = 0.001), and overall survival rate (P = 0.005) compared with the other stages. Using the CLIP scoring system, the group with a score of 4 to 5 showed a high recurrence rate (P = 0.023) and lower DFS (P = 0.011); however, the overall survival rate did not differ from that of the lower scoring group. The TNM system showed a trend of increased recurrence rate, decreased DFS, or survival rate according to T stage, albeit without statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

LDLT is considered the preferred therapeutic option in patients with an AFP level less than 100 ng/mL and a tumor diameter of less than 5 cm.

摘要

目的

探讨活体肝移植(LDLT)后肝细胞癌(HCC)复发的危险因素和各种标准的疗效。

方法

从 2000 年 10 月至 2011 年 11 月,我们机构对 233 例 HCC 成人患者进行了 LDLT。排除术后 9 例死亡病例后,我们回顾性分析了 224 例患者。为了确定复发的危险因素,我们评估了复发、无病生存率(DFS)率、生存率以及基于患者和肿瘤特征的其他各种因素。此外,我们根据自己的数据制定了自己的标准。接下来,我们将我们的选择标准与各种肿瘤分级标准(如米兰标准、加州大学旧金山分校标准、TNM 分期、巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期和肝癌意大利计划评分系统)进行了比较。中位随访时间为 68(6-139)个月。

结果

在接受 LDLT 治疗 HCC 的 224 例患者中,有 37 例(16.5%)在随访期间发生肿瘤复发。所有 HCC 患者 LDLT 后的 5 年 DFS 和总生存率分别为 80.9%和 76.4%。多因素分析显示,肿瘤直径{5 cm;P < 0.001;B 系数的指数[Exp(B)],11.89;95%CI:3.784-37.368}和甲胎蛋白水平[AFP,100 ng/mL;P = 0.021;Exp(B),2.892;95%CI:1.172-7.132}对 LDLT 后 HCC 复发有显著影响。因此,这两个因素被纳入我们的标准。根据这些数据,我们将选择标准设定为肿瘤直径≤5 cm 和 AFP≤100 ng/mL。在我们的新标准(140/214,65.4%)中,5 年 DFS 和总生存率分别为 88.6%和 81.8%。我们的标准(P = 0.001)、米兰标准(P = 0.009)和 UCSF 标准(P = 0.001)在 DFS 率方面有显著差异。我们的标准(P = 0.006)和 UCSF 标准(P = 0.009)在总生存率方面有显著差异。但米兰标准在总生存率方面没有显著差异(P = 0.137)。在 BCLC 的 0、A、B 和 C 期,C 期的复发率明显较高(P = 0.001),DFS(P = 0.001)和总生存率(P = 0.005)较低。使用 CLIP 评分系统,评分 4-5 分的组复发率较高(P = 0.023),DFS 较低(P = 0.011);然而,总生存率与较低评分组无差异。TNM 系统显示 T 分期越高,复发率、DFS 或生存率越高,尽管无统计学意义。

结论

对于 AFP 水平<100ng/ml 和肿瘤直径<5cm 的患者,LDLT 被认为是首选治疗方案。