Haskins Laboratories, University of Connecticut.
Cogn Sci. 2013 Sep-Oct;37(7):1193-227. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12072. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
Human participants and recurrent ("connectionist") neural networks were both trained on a categorization system abstractly similar to natural language systems involving irregular ("strong") classes and a default class. Both the humans and the networks exhibited staged learning and a generalization pattern reminiscent of the Elsewhere Condition (Kiparsky, 1973). Previous connectionist accounts of related phenomena have often been vague about the nature of the networks' encoding systems. We analyzed our network using dynamical systems theory, revealing topological and geometric properties that can be directly compared with the mechanisms of non-connectionist, rule-based accounts. The results reveal that the networks "contain" structures related to mechanisms posited by rule-based models, partly vindicating the insights of these models. On the other hand, they support the one mechanism (OM), as opposed to the more than one mechanism (MOM), view of symbolic abstraction by showing how the appearance of MOM behavior can arise emergently from one underlying set of principles. The key new contribution of this study is to show that dynamical systems theory can allow us to explicitly characterize the relationship between the two perspectives in implemented models.
人类参与者和递归(“连接主义”)神经网络都在一个分类系统上进行了训练,该系统抽象地类似于涉及不规则(“强”)类和默认类的自然语言系统。人类和网络都表现出了阶段学习和类似于异地条件(Kiparsky,1973)的泛化模式。先前有关相关现象的连接主义解释通常对网络的编码系统的性质含糊不清。我们使用动力系统理论分析了我们的网络,揭示了可以与基于规则的非连接主义解释机制直接比较的拓扑和几何性质。结果表明,网络“包含”与基于规则的模型所假设的机制相关的结构,部分证明了这些模型的洞察力。另一方面,它们通过展示如何从一组基本原理中出现 MOM 行为的出现,支持了一个机制(OM)而不是多个机制(MOM)的符号抽象观点。这项研究的一个关键新贡献是表明动力系统理论可以使我们能够在实现模型中明确表征两种观点之间的关系。