Suppr超能文献

急诊科分诊护士对晕厥风险分层评估的预测准确性。

Predictive accuracy of triage nurses evaluation in risk stratification of syncope in the emergency department.

作者信息

Bonzi M, Fiorelli E M, Angaroni L, Furlan L, Solbiati M, Colombo C, Dipaola F, Montano N, Furlan R, Costantino G

机构信息

Medicina ad indirizzo fisiopatologico, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche, Ospedale L. Sacco, Milan, Italy.

Department of Internal Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2014 Nov;31(11):877-81. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202813. Epub 2013 Aug 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Syncope is a common clinical problem that accounts for 1-3% of all emergency department (ED) visits. Its prognosis is extremely variable with a 1-year mortality that may reach 30%. There are no available data about the accuracy of nursing triage in identifying high-risk syncope. The aim of our study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of nursing triage in identifying high-risk syncope.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 678 consecutive patients who presented with syncope at four EDs. For each patient, nursing triage, comorbidities, clinical features and adverse events that occurred both in the ED and at 10-day follow-up were assessed. Adverse events included death, readmission to ED, need for major therapeutic procedures, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intensive care unit admittance, acute antiarrhythmic therapy and major causes of syncope identified during the ED evaluation. Predictive accuracy of nursing triage was evaluated.

RESULTS

We observed a total of 55 (8.1%) adverse events. Eight of them (9.4%) occurred among the 85 patients who were identified as high priority by nursing triage. Sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) of urgent nursing triage in identifying adverse outcomes in the ED (19 patients) were 21% (95% CI 3% to 39%) and 88% (95% CI 85% to 90%), while the positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) were 1.7 and 0.9, respectively. Sn and Sp for 10-day adverse events were 15% (95% CI 5% to 24%) and 88% (95% CI 85% to 90%), respectively, with a LR+ of 1.18 and a LR- of 0.98.

CONCLUSIONS

Nursing triage was characterised by a low predictive accuracy in identifying high-risk individuals.

摘要

背景

晕厥是一个常见的临床问题,占所有急诊科就诊病例的1%至3%。其预后差异极大,1年死亡率可能达到30%。目前尚无关于护理分诊识别高危晕厥准确性的可用数据。我们研究的目的是评估护理分诊识别高危晕厥的预测准确性。

方法

我们对在四个急诊科连续就诊的678例晕厥患者进行了一项回顾性研究。对每位患者评估护理分诊、合并症、临床特征以及在急诊科和10天随访期间发生的不良事件。不良事件包括死亡、再次入住急诊科、需要进行重大治疗操作、心肺复苏、入住重症监护病房、急性抗心律失常治疗以及在急诊科评估期间确定的晕厥主要原因。评估护理分诊的预测准确性。

结果

我们共观察到55例(8.1%)不良事件。其中8例(9.4%)发生在被护理分诊确定为高优先级的85例患者中。紧急护理分诊在识别急诊科不良结局(19例患者)方面的敏感性(Sn)和特异性(Sp)分别为21%(95%置信区间3%至39%)和88%(95%置信区间85%至90%),而阳性似然比(LR+)和阴性似然比(LR-)分别为1.7和0.9。10天不良事件的Sn和Sp分别为15%(95%置信区间5%至24%)和88%(95%置信区间85%至90%),LR+为1.18,LR-为0.98。

结论

护理分诊在识别高危个体方面预测准确性较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验