• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Conformance with supportive care quality measures is associated with better quality of life in patients with cancer receiving palliative care.符合支持性护理质量措施与接受姑息治疗的癌症患者的生活质量改善相关。
J Oncol Pract. 2013 May;9(3):e73-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.000948.
2
Development of the Quality Data Collection Tool for Prospective Quality Assessment and Reporting in Palliative Care.姑息治疗前瞻性质量评估与报告质量数据收集工具的开发
J Palliat Med. 2016 Nov;19(11):1148-1155. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0036. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
3
Quality of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer in a community consortium.社区联盟中晚期癌症患者的姑息治疗质量
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Feb;49(2):289-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.05.024. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
4
Comparison of Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Metrics in Solid Tumor Oncology Clinic With or Without Concomitant Supportive Oncology Consultation.比较实体瘤肿瘤学临床科室是否同时进行支持性肿瘤学咨询的质量肿瘤学实践倡议指标。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Dec;14(12):e786-e793. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00380.
5
Evolution of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative supportive care quality measures portfolio and conformance at a Veterans Affairs medical center.退伍军人事务医疗中心的肿瘤质量实践倡议支持性护理质量措施组合及其一致性的演变。
J Oncol Pract. 2013 May;9(3):e86-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.000923.
6
Usability and Acceptability of the QDACT-PC, an Electronic Point-of-Care System for Standardized Quality Monitoring in Palliative Care.姑息治疗标准化质量监测电子床边系统QDACT-PC的可用性与可接受性
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Nov;50(5):615-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
7
Assessment of Cancer-Related Fatigue, Pain, and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients at Palliative Care Team Referral: A Multicenter Observational Study (JORTC PAL-09).姑息治疗团队转诊时癌症患者的癌症相关疲劳、疼痛及生活质量评估:一项多中心观察性研究(JORTC PAL-09)
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0134022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134022. eCollection 2015.
8
Symptom Burden of Chronic Lung Disease Compared with Lung Cancer at Time of Referral for Palliative Care Consultation.慢性肺部疾病的症状负担与接受姑息治疗咨询时的肺癌相比。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Sep;12(9):1294-301. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201503-180OC.
9
Quality of life of cancer patients receiving inpatient and home-based palliative care.接受住院及居家姑息治疗的癌症患者的生活质量。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Mar;53(5):524-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03754.x.
10
Trends in Hospital-Based Specialty Palliative Care in the United States From 2013 to 2017.2013 年至 2017 年美国基于医院的专科姑息治疗趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917043. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17043.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilization of Prostate Cancer Quality Metrics for Research and Quality Improvement: A Structured Review.前列腺癌质量指标在研究和质量改进中的应用:一项结构化综述。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019 Mar;45(3):217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
2
The Impact of Measuring Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Quality of and Access to Palliative Care.测量患者报告结局指标对姑息治疗质量和可及性的影响。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;21(S1):S76-S80. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0447.
3
Risk factors for current and future unmet supportive care needs of people with pancreatic cancer. A longitudinal study.胰腺癌患者当前及未来未满足的支持性护理需求的风险因素。一项纵向研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Aug;24(8):3589-99. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3212-4. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
4
The level of association between functional performance status measures and patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: a systematic review.癌症患者功能表现状态测量与患者报告结局之间的关联程度:一项系统综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Dec;23(12):3645-52. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2923-2. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
5
Quality measures for palliative care in patients with cancer: a systematic review.癌症患者姑息治疗的质量指标:一项系统评价。
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Jul;10(4):281-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001212. Epub 2014 Jun 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Community-based palliative care: the natural evolution for palliative care delivery in the U.S.社区为基础的姑息治疗:美国姑息治疗提供的自然演变
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Aug;46(2):254-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
2
Integrating technology into palliative care research.将技术融入姑息治疗研究。
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2012 Dec;6(4):525-32. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e32835998c6.
3
Where does oncology fit in the scheme of accountable care?肿瘤学在责任制医疗体系中处于什么位置?
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Mar;8(2):71-4. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000550.
4
Demonstration of a sustainable community-based model of care across the palliative care continuum.展示一个贯穿整个姑息治疗连续体的可持续的基于社区的关怀模式。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Dec;44(6):797-809. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.12.278. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
5
Palliative care needs of patients with cancer living in the community.癌症患者的社区居住的姑息治疗需求。
J Oncol Pract. 2011 Nov;7(6):382-8. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000455.
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: the integration of palliative care into standard oncology care.美国临床肿瘤学会临时临床意见:姑息治疗融入标准肿瘤治疗。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 10;30(8):880-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5161. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
7
Collecting data on quality is feasible in community-based palliative care.在基于社区的姑息治疗中收集质量数据是可行的。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Nov;42(5):663-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.07.003.
8
The value of data collection within a palliative care program.在姑息治疗项目中进行数据收集的价值。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2011 Aug;13(4):308-15. doi: 10.1007/s11912-011-0178-8.
9
The PEACE Project: identification of quality measures for hospice and palliative care.PEACE 项目:临终关怀和姑息治疗质量指标的确定。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Dec;13(12):1451-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0238.
10
Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的早期姑息治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):733-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000678.

符合支持性护理质量措施与接受姑息治疗的癌症患者的生活质量改善相关。

Conformance with supportive care quality measures is associated with better quality of life in patients with cancer receiving palliative care.

机构信息

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2013 May;9(3):e73-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.000948.

DOI:10.1200/JOP.2013.000948
PMID:23942504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3651574/
Abstract

PURPOSE

As palliative care further integrates into cancer care, descriptions of how supportive care quality measures improve patient outcomes are necessary to establish best practices.

METHODS

We assessed the relationship between conformance to 18 palliative care quality measures and quality of life from data obtained using our novel point-of-care, electronic quality monitoring system, the Quality Data Collection Tool for Palliative Care (QDACT-PC). All patients with cancer from January 2008 through March 2011 seen in the Carolinas Palliative Care Consortium were evaluated for demographic, disease, prognostic, performance status, and measure conformance variables. Using univariate and multivariate regression, we examined the relationship between these variable and high quality of life at the initial specialty palliative care consultation.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 459 patients, the majority of whom were over age 65 years (66%) and white (84%). Lung (29.1%) and GI (24.7%) cancers were most common. In univariate analyses, conformance to assessment of comprehensive symptoms, fatigue and constipation assessment, timely management of pain and constipation, and timely emotional well-being assessment were associated with highest levels of quality of life (all Ps < .05). In a multivariate model (C-stat = 0.66), performance status (odds ratio [OR], 5.21; P = .003), estimated life expectancy (OR, 22.6; P = .003), conformance to the measure related to emotional well-being assessment (OR, 1.60; P = .026), and comprehensive screening of symptoms (OR, 1.74, P = .008) remained significant.

CONCLUSION

Oncology care pathways that routinely incorporate supportive care principles, such as comprehensive symptom and emotional well-being assessments, may improve patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

随着姑息治疗在癌症治疗中的进一步融合,需要描述支持性护理质量措施如何改善患者的结局,以确立最佳实践。

方法

我们评估了从使用我们新的床边电子质量监测系统,姑息治疗质量数据采集工具(QDACT-PC)获得的数据中,18 项姑息治疗质量措施的一致性与生活质量之间的关系。对 2008 年 1 月至 2011 年 3 月期间在卡罗莱纳姑息治疗联盟就诊的所有癌症患者进行评估,以获得人口统计学、疾病、预后、表现状态和措施一致性变量。使用单变量和多变量回归,我们检查了这些变量与初始专科姑息治疗咨询时高质量生活之间的关系。

结果

我们的队列包括 459 名患者,其中大多数患者年龄超过 65 岁(66%)且为白人(84%)。最常见的癌症是肺癌(29.1%)和胃肠道癌(24.7%)。在单变量分析中,全面症状评估、疲劳和便秘评估、疼痛和便秘的及时管理以及及时的情绪健康评估的一致性与生活质量的最高水平相关(均 P <.05)。在多变量模型(C 统计量=0.66)中,表现状态(比值比[OR],5.21;P =.003)、估计预期寿命(OR,22.6;P =.003)、对与情绪健康评估相关的措施的一致性(OR,1.60;P =.026)以及综合症状筛查(OR,1.74,P =.008)仍具有统计学意义。

结论

常规纳入支持性护理原则的肿瘤学护理路径,如全面的症状和情绪健康评估,可能会改善患者的结局。