Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):329-36. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
Large randomized screening trials provide an estimation of the effect of screening at a population-based level. The effect of screening for individuals, however, is diluted by nonattendance and contamination in the trial arms.
To determine the prostate cancer (PCa) mortality reduction from screening after adjustment for nonattendance and contamination.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 34,833 men in the core age group, 55-69 yr, were randomized to a screening or control arm in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing was offered to all men in the screening arm at 4-yr intervals. A prostate biopsy was offered to men with an elevated PSA. The primary end point was PCa-specific mortality.
Nonattendance was defined as nonparticipation in the screening arm. Contamination in the control arm was defined as receiving asymptomatic PSA testing or a prostate biopsy in the absence of symptoms. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated with an intention to screen (ITS) analysis and after correction for nonattendance and contamination using a method that preserves the benefits obtained by randomization.
The ITS analysis resulted in an RR of 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.89) in favor of screening at a median follow-up of 13 yr. Correction for both nonattendance and contamination resulted in an RR of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.27-0.87) in favor of screening.
PCa screening as conducted in the Rotterdam section of the ERSPC can reduce the risk of dying from PCa up to 51% for an individual man choosing to be screened repeatedly compared with a man who was not screened. This benefit of screening should be balanced against the harms of overdiagnosis and subsequent overtreatment.
ISRCTN49127736.
大规模随机筛选试验可在人群水平上估算筛查的效果。然而,由于试验组中的失访和污染,个体的筛查效果会被稀释。
确定在调整失访和污染后,筛查对前列腺癌(PCa)死亡率的降低效果。
设计、地点和参与者:共有 34833 名核心年龄组(55-69 岁)男性在鹿特丹欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)的部分被随机分配到筛查组或对照组。筛查组的所有男性每 4 年接受一次前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测。对于 PSA 升高的男性,建议进行前列腺活检。主要终点是 PCa 特异性死亡率。
失访定义为不参加筛查组。对照组的污染定义为无症状时接受 PSA 检测或前列腺活检。使用保留随机分组获益的方法,通过意向性筛查(ITS)分析和校正失访和污染后计算相对风险(RR)。
ITS 分析显示,在中位随访 13 年时,筛查组的 RR 为 0.68(95%置信区间 [CI],0.53-0.89),有利于筛查。校正失访和污染后,RR 为 0.49(95% CI,0.27-0.87),有利于筛查。
与未接受筛查的男性相比,在 ERSPC 的鹿特丹部分进行的 PCa 筛查可以将选择重复筛查的个体男性死于 PCa 的风险降低 51%。这种筛查的益处应该与过度诊断和随后过度治疗的危害相平衡。
ISRCTN49127736。