Terada Takashi, Maemura Yumi, Yoshida Akiko, Muto Rika, Ochiai Ryoichi
Department of Anesthesiology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, 5-21-16 Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan,
J Clin Monit Comput. 2014 Feb;28(1):95-9. doi: 10.1007/s10877-013-9501-2. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
Evaluation of the estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) allows non-invasive and continuous assessment of cardiac output. However, the applicability of this approach in children has not been assessed thus far. We compared the correlation coefficient, bias, standard deviation (SD), and the lower and upper 95 % limits of agreement for esCCO and dye densitography-cardiac output (DDG-CO) measurements by pulse dye densitometry (PDD) in adults and children. On the basis of these assessments, we aimed to examine whether esCCO can be used in pediatric patients. DDG-CO was measured by pulse dye densitometry (PDD) using indocyanine green. Modified-pulse wave transit time, obtained using pulse oximetry and electrocardiography, was used to measure esCCO. Correlations between DDG-CO and esCCO in adults and children were analyzed using regression analysis with the least squares method. Differences between the two correlation coefficients were statistically analyzed using a correlation coefficient test. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate bias and SD for DDG-CO and esCCO in both adults and children, and 95 % limits of agreement (bias ± 1.96 SD) and percentage error (1.96 SD/mean DDG-CO) were calculated and compared. The average age of the adult patients (n = 10) was 39.3 ± 12.1 years, while the average age of the pediatric patients (n = 7) was 9.4 ± 3.1 years (p < 0.001). For adults, the correlation coefficient was 0.756; bias, -0.258 L/min; SD, 1.583 L/min; lower and upper 95 % limits of agreement for DDG-CO and esCCO, -3.360 and 2.844 L/min, respectively; and percentage error, 42.7 %. For children, the corresponding values were 0.904; -0.270; 0.908; -2.051 and 1.510 L/min, respectively; and 35.7 %. Due to the high percentage error values, we could not establish a correlation between esCCO and DDG-CO. However, the 95 % limits of agreement and percentage error were better in children than in adults. Due to the high percentage error, we could not confirm a correlation between esCCO and DDG-CO. However, the agreement between esCCO and DDG-CO seems to be higher in children than in adults. These results suggest that esCCO can also be used in children. Future studies with bigger study populations will be required to further investigate these conclusions.
评估估计的连续心输出量(esCCO)可实现对心输出量的无创且连续评估。然而,该方法在儿童中的适用性迄今尚未得到评估。我们比较了成人和儿童中通过脉搏染料密度测定法(PDD)测量的esCCO与染料密度法心输出量(DDG-CO)的相关系数、偏差、标准差(SD)以及95%一致性界限的下限和上限。基于这些评估,我们旨在研究esCCO是否可用于儿科患者。使用吲哚菁绿通过脉搏染料密度测定法(PDD)测量DDG-CO。利用脉搏血氧饱和度仪和心电图获得的改良脉搏波传播时间用于测量esCCO。采用最小二乘法回归分析来分析成人和儿童中DDG-CO与esCCO之间的相关性。使用相关系数检验对两个相关系数之间的差异进行统计学分析。采用Bland-Altman图评估成人和儿童中DDG-CO与esCCO的偏差和SD,并计算和比较95%一致性界限(偏差±1.96 SD)和百分比误差(1.96 SD/平均DDG-CO)。成年患者(n = 10)的平均年龄为39.3±12.1岁,而儿科患者(n = 7)的平均年龄为9.4±3.1岁(p < 0.001)。对于成人,相关系数为0.756;偏差为 -0.258 L/分钟;SD为1.583 L/分钟;DDG-CO与esCCO的95%一致性界限下限和上限分别为 -3.360和2.844 L/分钟;百分比误差为42.7%。对于儿童,相应的值分别为0.904; -0.270;0.908; -2.051和1.510 L/分钟;以及35.7%。由于百分比误差值较高,我们无法确定esCCO与DDG-CO之间的相关性。然而,儿童的95%一致性界限和百分比误差比成人更好。由于百分比误差较高,我们无法证实esCCO与DDG-CO之间的相关性。然而,esCCO与DDG-CO之间的一致性在儿童中似乎高于成人。这些结果表明esCCO也可用于儿童。未来需要更大样本量的研究来进一步探究这些结论。