School of Public Health, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Cancer. 2013 Nov 15;119(22):4020-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28313. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
The objective of this study was assess differences in the incidence, late-stage diagnosis, and prognosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE), adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (AE), and adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia (AGC) in metropolitan, urban, and rural areas in the United States.
The authors identified 29,527 patients with SCCE, AE, or AGC who were reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program between 2004 and 2009. Incidence estimates for each malignancy were compared across metropolitan, urban, and rural areas. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to evaluate the association between residential setting and late (distant-stage) diagnosis, and the results were reported as adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association between residential setting and cause-specific survival.
When residential setting was analyzed using metropolitan population centers as the reference category, the incidence of AE was higher in urban areas (rate ratio [RR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.20) and rural areas (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25), whereas the incidence of SCCE was lower in rural areas (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.91). Rural patients were less likely to be diagnosed with stage IV AE compared with patients residing in metropolitan areas (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.97). No differences in prognosis were observed when patients from large metropolitan centers were compared with their rural counterparts.
The current findings indicated that preconceptions regarding disparities in the time of diagnosis and survival between patients from metropolitan and rural areas in the United States are either unwarranted or out of date, at least with respect to gastroesophageal cancers.
本研究旨在评估美国大都市、城市和农村地区食管鳞癌(SCCE)、食管腺癌(AE)和胃贲门腺癌(AGC)的发病率、晚期诊断和预后差异。
作者从 2004 年至 2009 年的监测、流行病学和最终结果计划(Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program)中确定了 29527 例 SCCE、AE 或 AGC 患者。比较了每一种恶性肿瘤在大都市、城市和农村地区的发病率估计值。应用多变量逻辑回归模型评估居住环境与晚期(远处期)诊断的关系,并以调整后的优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)表示结果。使用 Cox 比例风险模型检查居住环境与特定原因生存之间的关系。
当以大都市人口中心为参考类别分析居住环境时,AE 在城市(RR,1.13;95%CI,1.06-1.20)和农村(RR,1.15;95%CI,1.05-1.25)地区的发病率较高,而 SCCE 在农村地区的发病率较低(RR,0.80;95%CI,0.70-0.91)。与居住在大都市地区的患者相比,农村患者被诊断为 IV 期 AE 的可能性较小(OR,0.79;95%CI,0.65-0.97)。当将来自大城市中心的患者与农村患者进行比较时,未观察到预后差异。
目前的研究结果表明,美国大都市和农村地区患者在诊断和生存时间方面存在差异的观念是没有根据的或过时的,至少在胃食管癌症方面是如此。