• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验室间条件下三种不同的血小板浓缩物细菌检测系统。

Three different bacterial detection systems for platelet concentrates under inter-laboratory conditions.

作者信息

GuoHui Bian, Chunhui Yang, Miao He, Hong Wang, Jiaxin Liu, Ye Cao, Hong Yang, Zhong Liu, Wuping Li

机构信息

Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Transfus Apher Sci. 2013 Dec;49(3):600-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2013.07.029. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.transci.2013.07.029
PMID:23972777
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A variety of screening methods are currently used worldwide in order to decrease the risk of transfusion-transmitted sepsis and improve the safety of PCs.

METHODS/MATERIALS: PCs inoculated with five different transfusion-relevant species of bacteria at concentrations of 1, 10, and 100 colony-forming units (CFU)ml(-1) were stored at 22°C for 7 days. Flow cytometry (FACS), BacT/Alert automated culturing, and a quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) were then used to detect the presence of bacteria in samples prepared from these PCs.

RESULTS

At the initial spiking concentrations of 1, 10, and 100 CFU ml(-1), Q-PCR detected all five bacterial species tested. Screening with the BacT/Alert culture-based system allowed bacterial detection (inoculated on day 0) within a mean time of 15.13 h for all three spiking concentrations. Using FACS, positive signals were obtained for all three concentrations of Escherichia coli and Bacillus cereus on day 1 and for initial spiking concentrations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus of 1 CFU ml(-1) on day 2. For Staphylococcus epidermidis, detection of an initial inoculum of 1 CFU ml(-1) was possible only beginning on day 6.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that under standard laboratory conditions the sensitivity of FACS in the detection of bacterial contamination of PCs was lower than that of either the BacT/Alert automated culturing method or Q-PCR.

摘要

背景

目前全球使用多种筛查方法,以降低输血传播败血症的风险并提高血小板成分(PCs)的安全性。

方法/材料:将接种了五种不同输血相关细菌、浓度分别为1、10和100菌落形成单位(CFU)/毫升的PCs在22°C下储存7天。然后使用流式细胞术(FACS)、BacT/Alert自动培养法和定量实时聚合酶链反应(Q-PCR)检测从这些PCs制备的样本中细菌的存在情况。

结果

在初始加样浓度为1、10和100 CFU/毫升时,Q-PCR检测到了所有五种测试细菌。使用基于BacT/Alert培养系统进行筛查,对于所有三种加样浓度,在第0天接种的细菌平均在15.13小时内被检测到。使用FACS,在第1天对所有三种浓度的大肠杆菌和蜡样芽孢杆菌均获得阳性信号,对于铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌,在第2天对初始加样浓度为1 CFU/毫升的样本获得阳性信号。对于表皮葡萄球菌,仅从第6天开始才能检测到初始接种量为1 CFU/毫升的样本。

结论

本研究表明,在标准实验室条件下,FACS检测PCs细菌污染的灵敏度低于BacT/Alert自动培养法或Q-PCR。

相似文献

1
Three different bacterial detection systems for platelet concentrates under inter-laboratory conditions.实验室间条件下三种不同的血小板浓缩物细菌检测系统。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2013 Dec;49(3):600-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2013.07.029. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
2
Optimal sampling time after preparation of platelet concentrates for detection of bacterial contamination by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.血小板浓缩物制备后用于通过定量实时聚合酶链反应检测细菌污染的最佳采样时间。
Vox Sang. 2005 Nov;89(4):208-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2005.00707.x.
3
Detection of bacteria in platelet concentrates: comparison of broad-range real-time 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction and automated culturing.血小板浓缩物中细菌的检测:广谱实时16S rDNA聚合酶链反应与自动培养的比较
Transfusion. 2005 May;45(5):731-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04258.x.
4
Evaluation of two detection methods of microorganisms in platelet concentrates.血小板浓缩物中微生物两种检测方法的评估
Transfus Med. 2011 Dec;21(6):408-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2011.01105.x. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
5
Evaluation of the BacT/Alert automated blood culture system for detecting bacteria and measuring their growth kinetics in leucodepleted and non-leucodepleted platelet concentrates.评估BacT/Alert自动血培养系统在检测白细胞去除和未去除的血小板浓缩物中的细菌及其生长动力学方面的性能。
Vox Sang. 2001 Oct;81(3):154-60. doi: 10.1046/j.0042-9007.2001.00104.x.
6
Development of a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay for eubacterial RNA detection in platelet concentrates.开发一种逆转录-聚合酶链反应检测法,用于检测血小板浓缩物中的真核细菌 RNA。
Transfusion. 2010 Jun;50(6):1352-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02580.x. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
7
Six years' experience of using the BacT/ALERT system to screen all platelet concentrates, and additional testing of outdated platelet concentrates to estimate the frequency of false-negative results.使用BacT/ALERT系统对所有血小板浓缩物进行筛查的六年经验,以及对过期血小板浓缩物进行额外检测以估计假阴性结果的频率。
Vox Sang. 2005 Feb;88(2):93-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2005.00596.x.
8
A comparison of three rapid bacterial detection methods under simulated real-life conditions.三种快速细菌检测方法在模拟实际生活条件下的比较。
Transfusion. 2006 Aug;46(8):1367-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00904.x.
9
Performance and suitability of polymerase chain reaction for early detection of bacteria in platelet concentrates.聚合酶链反应在血小板浓缩物中早期检测细菌的性能和适用性。
Transfusion. 2011 Sep;51(9):2006-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03090.x. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
10
Inter-laboratory comparison of different rapid methods for the detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates.不同快速方法检测血小板浓缩物中细菌污染的实验室间比较。
Vox Sang. 2012 Jul;103(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2011.01572.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Contribution of Fluorescence Techniques in Determining the Efficiency of the Non-thermal Plasma Treatment.荧光技术在确定非热等离子体处理效率方面的贡献。
Front Microbiol. 2018 Sep 10;9:2171. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02171. eCollection 2018.