Suppr超能文献

实验室间条件下三种不同的血小板浓缩物细菌检测系统。

Three different bacterial detection systems for platelet concentrates under inter-laboratory conditions.

作者信息

GuoHui Bian, Chunhui Yang, Miao He, Hong Wang, Jiaxin Liu, Ye Cao, Hong Yang, Zhong Liu, Wuping Li

机构信息

Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Transfus Apher Sci. 2013 Dec;49(3):600-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2013.07.029. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A variety of screening methods are currently used worldwide in order to decrease the risk of transfusion-transmitted sepsis and improve the safety of PCs.

METHODS/MATERIALS: PCs inoculated with five different transfusion-relevant species of bacteria at concentrations of 1, 10, and 100 colony-forming units (CFU)ml(-1) were stored at 22°C for 7 days. Flow cytometry (FACS), BacT/Alert automated culturing, and a quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) were then used to detect the presence of bacteria in samples prepared from these PCs.

RESULTS

At the initial spiking concentrations of 1, 10, and 100 CFU ml(-1), Q-PCR detected all five bacterial species tested. Screening with the BacT/Alert culture-based system allowed bacterial detection (inoculated on day 0) within a mean time of 15.13 h for all three spiking concentrations. Using FACS, positive signals were obtained for all three concentrations of Escherichia coli and Bacillus cereus on day 1 and for initial spiking concentrations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus of 1 CFU ml(-1) on day 2. For Staphylococcus epidermidis, detection of an initial inoculum of 1 CFU ml(-1) was possible only beginning on day 6.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that under standard laboratory conditions the sensitivity of FACS in the detection of bacterial contamination of PCs was lower than that of either the BacT/Alert automated culturing method or Q-PCR.

摘要

背景

目前全球使用多种筛查方法,以降低输血传播败血症的风险并提高血小板成分(PCs)的安全性。

方法/材料:将接种了五种不同输血相关细菌、浓度分别为1、10和100菌落形成单位(CFU)/毫升的PCs在22°C下储存7天。然后使用流式细胞术(FACS)、BacT/Alert自动培养法和定量实时聚合酶链反应(Q-PCR)检测从这些PCs制备的样本中细菌的存在情况。

结果

在初始加样浓度为1、10和100 CFU/毫升时,Q-PCR检测到了所有五种测试细菌。使用基于BacT/Alert培养系统进行筛查,对于所有三种加样浓度,在第0天接种的细菌平均在15.13小时内被检测到。使用FACS,在第1天对所有三种浓度的大肠杆菌和蜡样芽孢杆菌均获得阳性信号,对于铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌,在第2天对初始加样浓度为1 CFU/毫升的样本获得阳性信号。对于表皮葡萄球菌,仅从第6天开始才能检测到初始接种量为1 CFU/毫升的样本。

结论

本研究表明,在标准实验室条件下,FACS检测PCs细菌污染的灵敏度低于BacT/Alert自动培养法或Q-PCR。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验