Suppr超能文献

扩大保乳乳房切除术的适应证。

Increasing eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(10):3218-22. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3152-x. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) varies widely on the basis of patient and tumor factors.

METHODS

Review of patients undergoing NSM from June 2007 to December 2012 at our institution was performed. Patient and tumor characteristics, complications, and recurrences were collected. NSM from 2007 to 2010 and 2011 to 2012 were compared to assess trends in eligibility and outcomes over time.

RESULTS

NSM was performed on 645 breasts in 370 patients. Indications were risk reduction in 330 (51.2 %), invasive cancer in 226 (35.0 %), and ductal carcinoma-in situ in 89 (13.8 %) breasts. Fifty-one (13.8 %) patients had positive lymph nodes. Twenty-seven (7.3 %) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-eight (7.4 %) breasts had prior radiotherapy. Total nipple necrosis occurred in 11 (1.7 %) breasts. Twenty-four (3.7 %) breasts had nipples removed as a result of positive subareolar/nipple margins. At 22 months' mean follow-up, local recurrence occurred in 4 of 156 (2.6 %) breasts operated on for cancer through 2011. No recurrences involved the nipple. NSM performed in 2011-2012 (n = 475) compared to 2007-2010 (n = 170), were more often for cancer, in patients with higher body mass index, and on larger breasts (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in total nipple necrosis rates between groups. Nipple loss due to positive subareolar/nipple margins was significantly less in 2011-2012 (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Eligibility for NSM has expanded to include women with higher body mass index and larger breasts, with no increase in nipple loss due to ischemia. Rates of positive subareolar margins have decreased over time, even though NSM is being performed more frequently for cancer, suggesting improved patient selection.

摘要

背景

保乳乳头切除术(NSM)的适应证因患者和肿瘤因素的不同而存在较大差异。

方法

对我院 2007 年 6 月至 2012 年 12 月期间接受 NSM 的患者进行回顾性分析。收集患者和肿瘤特征、并发症和复发情况。比较 2007 年至 2010 年和 2011 年至 2012 年的 NSM,以评估随时间推移的适应证和结果趋势。

结果

在 370 例患者的 645 个乳房中进行了 NSM。适应证为降低风险 330 例(51.2%)、浸润性癌 226 例(35.0%)和导管原位癌 89 例(13.8%)。51 例(13.8%)患者的淋巴结阳性。27 例(7.3%)患者接受了新辅助化疗。48 例(7.4%)乳房曾接受过放疗。11 例(1.7%)乳房发生全乳头坏死。24 例(3.7%)乳房因乳晕/乳头切缘阳性而切除乳头。在平均 22 个月的随访中,2011 年之前因癌症而行手术的 156 例乳房中有 4 例(2.6%)发生局部复发。无乳头受累复发。与 2007-2010 年(170 例)相比,2011-2012 年(475 例)行 NSM 的患者更常为癌症患者,BMI 更高,乳房更大(p<0.001)。两组全乳头坏死率无显著差异。2011-2012 年乳晕/乳头切缘阳性导致的乳头丢失明显减少(p=0.027)。

结论

NSM 的适应证已扩大到包括 BMI 较高和乳房较大的患者,且由于缺血导致的乳头丢失没有增加。尽管 NSM 因癌症而更频繁地进行,但乳晕切缘阳性率已随时间降低,提示患者选择得到改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验