Lakdawalla Darius, Sood Neeraj
University of Southern California and NBER.
J Public Econ. 2013 Jun 1;102:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.03.001.
Monopolies appear throughout health care. We show that health insurance operates like a conventional two-part pricing contract that allows monopolists to extract profits without inefficiently constraining quantity. When insurers are free to offer a range of insurance contracts to different consumer types, health insurance markets perfectly eliminate deadweight losses from upstream health care monopolies. Frictions limiting the sorting of different consumer types into different insurance contracts restore some of these upstream monopoly losses, which manifest as higher rates of uninsurance, rather than as restrictions in quantity utilized by insured consumers. Empirical analysis of pharmaceutical patent expiration supports the prediction that heavily insured markets experience little or no efficiency loss under monopoly, while less insured markets exhibit behavior more consistent with the standard theory of monopoly.
垄断现象在整个医疗保健领域随处可见。我们发现,医疗保险的运作方式类似于传统的两部定价合同,这使得垄断者能够获取利润,而不会对数量进行低效限制。当保险公司能够自由地向不同类型的消费者提供一系列保险合同时,医疗保险市场能够完美消除上游医疗保健垄断造成的无谓损失。限制不同类型消费者被分类到不同保险合同中的摩擦因素,会使这些上游垄断损失有所恢复,这些损失表现为更高的未参保率,而不是已参保消费者使用量的限制。对药品专利到期的实证分析支持了这样的预测:在垄断情况下,高保险覆盖的市场几乎没有效率损失,而保险覆盖较低的市场表现出的行为更符合标准的垄断理论。