Suppr超能文献

邻里社会关系:居住、物理和虚拟流动性有多大影响?

Neighbourhood social ties: how much do residential, physical and virtual mobility matter?

机构信息

ISER, University of Essex, UK.

出版信息

Br J Sociol. 2013 Sep;64(3):425-52. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12026.

Abstract

Following up on the prediction by classical sociological theorists that neighbours will become irrelevant as societies become more mobile, this research examines the strength of people's social ties with neighbours and the associations thereof with residential, physical and virtual mobility using longitudinal data for Germany. Unlike previous studies, the research considers the three forms of mobility simultaneously and contrasts its effects on social ties with neighbours to those with family. The results show that residential and physical mobility are negatively associated with social ties to neighbours and positively with ties to family. Virtual mobility does not weaken social ties with neighbours but ties with family. The positive association between mobility and social ties with family may not be strong enough to ascertain that people maintain as close social ties to others in the future as it does not outweigh the negative association with visiting neighbours.

摘要

继经典社会理论家预测社会变得更加流动时,邻居会变得不再重要之后,本研究使用德国的纵向数据,考察了人们与邻居的社会关系的强弱及其与居住、身体和虚拟流动的关联。与以往的研究不同,本研究同时考虑了这三种流动形式,并将其对与邻居的社会关系的影响与对与家庭的社会关系的影响进行了对比。研究结果表明,居住和身体流动与与邻居的社会关系呈负相关,与与家庭的社会关系呈正相关。虚拟流动不会削弱与邻居的社会关系,但会削弱与家庭的关系。流动性与家庭社会关系的正相关可能不够强,无法确定人们在未来与他人保持密切的社会关系,因为它没有超过与邻居的负面关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验