Kuemmerle J M, Berchtold S
Dr. Jan Kümmerle, Equine Hospital, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurer Strasse 260, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland, Phone: +41 44 635 8690, Fax: +41 44 635 8905, E-mail:
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2013;26(6):489-92. doi: 10.3415/VCOT-12-01-0016. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
This study compared the areas of cartilage accessible for curettage in arthrodesis of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint using the conventional and collateral ligament sparing approaches. For this purpose, forelimbs and hindlimbs of six equine cadavers without radiographic evidence of proximal interphalangeal joint disease were used. One limb of each pair of limbs was randomly assigned to a dissection using a standard approach to the proximal interphalangeal joint including transection of the collateral ligaments, while each contralateral limb was exposed using the same approach but leaving the collateral ligaments intact. Hohmann retractors and Spratt curettes were then used to remove as much articular cartilage as possible. Finally, proximal interphalangeal joints were photographed and image analysis was performed. Using the collateral ligament sparing procedure, the mean percentage of articular cartilage surface removed (41.2%) was significantly less than using the conventional procedure (79.6%) (p <0.01). The difference between forelimbs and hindlimbs was not significant.
本研究比较了在马近端指间关节融合术中,采用传统方法和保留侧副韧带方法时可用于刮除的软骨面积。为此,使用了六具无近端指间关节疾病影像学证据的马尸体的前肢和后肢。每对肢体中的一个随机分配至采用包括切断侧副韧带的近端指间关节标准解剖方法进行解剖,而每对的对侧肢体采用相同方法暴露,但保留侧副韧带完整。然后使用霍曼牵开器和斯普拉特刮匙尽可能多地去除关节软骨。最后,对近端指间关节进行拍照并进行图像分析。采用保留侧副韧带的方法,去除的关节软骨表面平均百分比(41.2%)显著低于采用传统方法(79.6%)(p<0.01)。前肢和后肢之间的差异不显著。