Oscar Ö Braun, MD PhD, Department of Cardiology, Skåne University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden, Tel: +46 707552356, Fax: +46 46157857, E-mail:
Thromb Haemost. 2013 Dec;110(6):1223-31. doi: 10.1160/TH13-03-0263. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
Clopidogrel response varies according to the presence of genetic polymorphisms. The CYP2C192 allele has been associated with impaired response; conflicting results have been reported for CYP2C1917, ABCB1, and PON1 genotypes. We assessed the impact of CYP2C19, PON1, and ABCB1 polymorphisms on clopidogrel and prasugrel pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Aspirin-treated patients (N=194) with coronary artery disease from two independent, prospective, randomised, multi-centre studies comparing clopidogrel (75 mg) and prasugrel (10 mg) were genotyped and classified by predicted CYP2C19 metaboliser phenotype (ultra metabolisers [UM] = *17 carriers; extensive metabolisers [EM] = *1/1 homozygotes; reduced metabolisers [RM] = *2 carriers). ABCB1 T/T and C/T polymorphisms and PON1 A/A, A/G and G/G polymorphisms were also genotyped. PD parameters were assessed using VerifyNow® P2Y12 and vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) expressed as platelet reactivity index (PRI) after 14 days of maintenance dosing. Clopidogrel and prasugrel active metabolite (AM) exposure was calculated in a cohort of 96 patients. For clopidogrel, genetic variants in CYP2C19, but not ABCB1 or PON1, affected PK and PD. For prasugrel, none of the measured genetic variants affected PK or PD. Compared with clopidogrel, platelet inhibition with prasugrel was greater even in the CYP2C19 UM phenotype. Prasugrel generated more AM and achieved greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel irrespective of CYP2C19, ABCB1, and PON1 polymorphisms. The lack of effect from genetic variants on prasugrel AM generation or antiplatelet activity is consistent with previous studies in healthy volunteers and is consistent with improved efficacy in acute coronary syndrome patients managed with percutaneous coronary intervention.
氯吡格雷的反应因遗传多态性的存在而不同。CYP2C192 等位基因与反应受损有关;CYP2C1917、ABCB1 和 PON1 基因型的结果存在冲突。我们评估了 CYP2C19、PON1 和 ABCB1 多态性对氯吡格雷和普拉格雷药效学(PD)和药代动力学(PK)参数的影响。来自两项独立的、前瞻性的、随机的、多中心研究的阿司匹林治疗的冠心病患者(N=194),比较了氯吡格雷(75mg)和普拉格雷(10mg),对其进行基因分型,并根据预测的 CYP2C19 代谢表型进行分类(超快代谢者[UM]=*17 携带者;广泛代谢者[EM]=*1/1 纯合子;低代谢者[RM]=*2 携带者)。还对 ABCB1 T/T 和 C/T 多态性以及 PON1 A/A、A/G 和 G/G 多态性进行了基因分型。使用 VerifyNow® P2Y12 和血管扩张刺激磷蛋白(VASP)在维持剂量治疗 14 天后作为血小板反应指数(PRI)评估 PD 参数。在 96 例患者的队列中计算了氯吡格雷和普拉格雷的活性代谢物(AM)暴露量。对于氯吡格雷,CYP2C19 的遗传变异,而不是 ABCB1 或 PON1,影响 PK 和 PD。对于普拉格雷,测量的遗传变异均不影响 PK 或 PD。与氯吡格雷相比,即使在 CYP2C19 UM 表型中,普拉格雷的血小板抑制作用也更强。普拉格雷产生的 AM 更多,血小板抑制作用大于氯吡格雷,无论 CYP2C19、ABCB1 和 PON1 多态性如何。遗传变异对普拉格雷 AM 生成或抗血小板活性无影响,这与健康志愿者的先前研究一致,并且与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者的疗效改善一致。