Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Nov;3(11):933-40. doi: 10.1002/alr.21208. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
Current symptom criteria poorly predict a diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) resulting in excessive treatment of patients with presumed CRS. The objective of this study was analyze the positive predictive value of individual symptoms, or symptoms in combination, in patients with CRS symptoms and examine the costs of the subsequent diagnostic algorithm using a decision tree-based cost analysis.
We analyzed previously collected patient-reported symptoms from a cross-sectional study of patients who had received a computed tomography (CT) scan of their sinuses at a tertiary care otolaryngology clinic for evaluation of CRS symptoms to calculate the positive predictive value of individual symptoms. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis then optimized combinations of symptoms and thresholds to identify CRS patients. The calculated positive predictive values were applied to a previously developed decision tree that compared an upfront CT (uCT) algorithm against an empiric medical therapy (EMT) algorithm with further analysis that considered the availability of point of care (POC) imaging.
The positive predictive value of individual symptoms ranged from 0.21 for patients reporting forehead pain and to 0.69 for patients reporting hyposmia. The CART model constructed a dichotomous model based on forehead pain, maxillary pain, hyposmia, nasal discharge, and facial pain (C-statistic 0.83). If POC CT were available, median costs ($64-$415) favored using the upfront CT for all individual symptoms. If POC CT was unavailable, median costs favored uCT for most symptoms except intercanthal pain (-$15), hyposmia (-$100), and discolored nasal discharge (-$24), although these symptoms became equivocal on cost sensitivity analysis. The three-tiered CART model could subcategorize patients into tiers where uCT was always favorable (median costs: $332-$504) and others for which EMT was always favorable (median costs -$121 to -$275). The uCT algorithm was always more costly if the nasal endoscopy was positive.
Among patients with classic CRS symptoms, the frequency of individual symptoms varied the likelihood of a CRS diagnosis marginally. Only hyposmia, the absence of facial pain, and discolored discharge sufficiently increased the likelihood of diagnosis to potentially make EMT less costly. The development of an evidence-based, multisymptom-based risk stratification model could substantially affect the management costs of the subsequent diagnostic algorithm.
当前的症状标准对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)的诊断预测效果不佳,导致对疑似 CRS 患者的过度治疗。本研究旨在分析 CRS 症状患者的单个症状或联合症状的阳性预测值,并使用基于决策树的成本分析来检查后续诊断算法的成本。
我们分析了在一家三级护理耳鼻喉科诊所接受鼻窦计算机断层扫描(CT)检查以评估 CRS 症状的患者的横断面研究中收集的患者报告的症状,以计算单个症状的阳性预测值。分类和回归树(CART)分析然后优化了症状和阈值的组合,以识别 CRS 患者。计算出的阳性预测值应用于先前开发的决策树,该决策树比较了 upfront CT(uCT)算法与经验性医学治疗(EMT)算法,并进一步分析了在有条件的即时成像(POC)的情况下的可用性。
单个症状的阳性预测值范围从报告额头痛的患者的 0.21 到报告嗅觉减退的患者的 0.69。CART 模型基于额头痛、上颌痛、嗅觉减退、鼻涕和面部疼痛构建了一个二分类模型(C 统计量为 0.83)。如果 POC CT 可用,则对于所有单个症状,中位数成本($64-415)都支持使用 upfront CT。如果 POC CT 不可用,则中位数成本有利于大多数症状的 uCT,除了内眦痛(-$15)、嗅觉减退(-$100)和变色鼻涕(-$24),尽管这些症状在成本敏感性分析中变得不确定。三阶 CART 模型可以将患者分为三阶,其中 uCT 总是有利(中位数成本:$332-$504),而其他患者 EMT 总是有利(中位数成本-$121 至-$275)。如果鼻内窥镜检查阳性,则 uCT 算法的成本总是更高。
在具有典型 CRS 症状的患者中,单个症状的频率略微改变了 CRS 诊断的可能性。只有嗅觉减退、无面部疼痛和变色鼻涕才能显著增加诊断的可能性,从而使 EMT 的成本更低。基于多症状的循证风险分层模型的发展可能会对后续诊断算法的管理成本产生重大影响。