Suppr超能文献

在评估无可触及肿块的局灶性乳房疼痛患者时,乳腺超声和乳腺 X 线摄影的作用。

Role of breast ultrasound and mammography in evaluating patients presenting with focal breast pain in the absence of a palpable lump.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.

出版信息

Breast J. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(6):582-9. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12178. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

Abstract

To determine if ultrasound and/or mammography is helpful in detecting breast cancers in patients presenting with focal breast pain. Patients who presented between February 2008 and April 2011 with focal breast pain without a lump were included in the study. The mammographic and US findings were retrospectively reviewed. BIRADS 0, 4, and 5 were considered positive on mammogram while BIRADS 4 and 5 were considered positive on US. The efficacy of mammogram-alone, ultrasound-alone, and in combination to detect breast cancer was evaluated. The performance of mammography for detecting any mass lesions that were present on subsequent US was also evaluated. A total of 257 patients were evaluated with US and 206 (80.1%) of these also had mammograms prior to the US. Cancer incidence was 1.2% (n = 3). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of mammogram-alone and US-alone for detection of breast cancer in these patients were 100%, 87.6%, 10.7%, 100% and 100%, 92.5%, 13.6%, and 100%, respectively, while for combined mammogram and US was 100%, 83.7%, 8.3%, and 100%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of mammogram for identifying an underlying suspicious mass lesion that was subsequently detected by US was 58%, 91%, 39%, and 95%. The NPV of a BIRADS 1 mammogram for any underlying mass lesion was 75%. Addition of an ultrasound to a mammogram did not detect additional cancers; likely due to low cancer incidence in these patients. However, US detected underlying mass lesions in 25% cases with a BIRADS 1 mammogram result.

摘要

为了确定在出现局灶性乳房疼痛的患者中,超声和/或乳房 X 光检查是否有助于检测乳腺癌。本研究纳入了 2008 年 2 月至 2011 年 4 月间出现局灶性乳房疼痛且无肿块的患者。回顾性分析乳房 X 光和超声检查结果。在乳房 X 光片上,BIRADS 0、4 和 5 被认为是阳性,而在超声上,BIRADS 4 和 5 被认为是阳性。评估了单独进行乳房 X 光检查、单独进行超声检查以及联合检查对检测乳腺癌的效果。还评估了乳房 X 光检查对检测随后超声检查中存在的任何肿块病变的表现。共对 257 例患者进行了超声检查,其中 206 例(80.1%)患者在超声检查前还进行了乳房 X 光检查。癌症发生率为 1.2%(n=3)。在这些患者中,单独进行乳房 X 光检查和单独进行超声检查对乳腺癌的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 100%、87.6%、10.7%和 100%和 100%、92.5%、13.6%和 100%,而联合进行乳房 X 光检查和超声检查的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 100%、83.7%、8.3%和 100%。乳房 X 光检查对识别随后由超声检测到的可疑潜在肿块病变的敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 58%、91%、39%和 95%。BIRADS 1 乳房 X 光检查对任何潜在肿块病变的 NPV 为 75%。在乳房 X 光检查的基础上增加超声检查并未检测到更多的癌症;可能是由于这些患者的癌症发病率较低。然而,超声检查在 25%的 BIRADS 1 乳房 X 光检查结果的病例中检测到了潜在的肿块病变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验