Suppr超能文献

使用植入物进行治疗:裸金属支架还是药物洗脱支架?

Treating with an implant: BMS or DES?

作者信息

Marques L, Preiss M, Preuss H, Hopf-Jensen S, Mueller-Huelsbeck S

机构信息

Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology/Neuroradiology,, Flensburg, Germany -

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2013 Aug;54(4):455-67.

Abstract

As the minimal invasive procedures for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease grow at exponential rates, interventional radiologists and vascular surgeons are more often faced with the difficult decision of which devices are the most appropriate to bring the desired results. Under the light of the newest studies and always having in mind the concept of "leaving no metal behind", when focusing on the lesions within the superficial femoral artery and popliteal arteries, we try to answer the question: treating with an implant, bare metal stents or drug eluting stents?

摘要

随着用于治疗外周动脉疾病的微创程序呈指数级增长,介入放射科医生和血管外科医生越来越频繁地面临艰难抉择,即哪种设备最适合带来预期效果。根据最新研究,并始终牢记“不遗留金属”的理念,当关注股浅动脉和腘动脉内的病变时,我们试图回答这个问题:使用植入物、裸金属支架还是药物洗脱支架进行治疗?

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验