Baker Richard, Willars Janet, McNicol Sarah, Dixon-Woods Mary, McKee Lorna
Professor of Quality in Health Care, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, UK.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014 Jan;19(1):34-41. doi: 10.1177/1355819613500664. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
Although the predominant model of general practice in the UK National Health Service (NHS) remains the small partnership owned and run by general practitioners (GPs), new types of provider are emerging. We sought to characterize the quality and safety systems and processes used in one large, privately owned company providing primary care through a chain of over 50 general practices in England.
Senior staff with responsibility for policy on quality and safety were interviewed. We also undertook ethnographic observation in non-clinical areas and interviews with staff in three practices.
A small senior executive team set policy and strategy on quality and safety, including a systematic incident reporting and investigation system and processes for disseminating learning with a strong emphasis on customer focus. Standardization of systems was possible because of the large number of practices. Policies appeared generally well implemented at practice level. However, there was some evidence of high staff turnover, particularly of GPs. This caused problems for continuity of care and challenges in inducting new GPs in the company's systems and procedures.
A model of primary care delivery based on a corporate chain may be useful in standardizing policies and procedures, facilitating implementation of systems, and relieving clinical staff of administrative duties. However, the model also poses some risks, including those relating to stability. Provider forms that retain the long term, personal commitment of staff to their practices, such as federations or networks, should also be investigated; they may offer the benefits of a corporate chain combined with the greater continuity and stability of the more traditional general practice.
尽管英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中全科医疗的主要模式仍是由全科医生(GP)拥有和运营的小型合伙诊所,但新型医疗服务提供者正在涌现。我们试图描述一家大型私人公司的质量与安全体系及流程,该公司通过英格兰50多家全科诊所组成的连锁机构提供初级医疗服务。
对负责质量与安全政策的高级职员进行了访谈。我们还在非临床区域进行了人种志观察,并对三家诊所的工作人员进行了访谈。
一个小型高级管理团队制定质量与安全方面的政策和战略,包括一个系统的事件报告和调查系统,以及强调以客户为中心的学习传播流程。由于诊所有很多,系统标准化是可行的。这些政策在诊所层面似乎普遍得到了很好的实施。然而,有证据表明员工流动率较高,尤其是全科医生。这给医疗服务的连续性带来了问题,也给新入职的全科医生融入公司的系统和程序带来了挑战。
基于公司连锁的初级医疗服务模式可能有助于政策和程序的标准化,促进系统的实施,并减轻临床工作人员的行政职责。然而,该模式也带来了一些风险,包括与稳定性相关的风险。还应研究能让员工对其诊所保持长期个人承诺的医疗服务提供形式,比如联合会或网络;它们可能兼具公司连锁的优势,以及更传统全科医疗的更强连续性和稳定性。