• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药店的争议空间:苏格兰西部公众对药店减少伤害服务的态度。

Contested space in the pharmacy: public attitudes to pharmacy harm reduction services in the West of Scotland.

机构信息

Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, The John Arbuthnott Building, 27 Taylor Street, Glasgow G4 0NR, UK.

Drug and Alcohol Research Unit, School of Social Science and Social Work, Plymouth University, 9 Portland Villas, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 May-Jun;10(3):576-87. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.07.006
PMID:24021859
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Internationally, community pharmacies have become increasingly involved in providing harm reduction services and health advice to people who use illicit drugs.

OBJECTIVE

This paper considers public opinion of community pharmacy services. It discusses attitudes to harm reduction services in the context of stigmatization of addiction and people who use drugs.

METHODS

This exploratory study involved twenty-six purposively sampled members of the public, from the West of Scotland, participating in one of 5 focus groups. The groups were composed to represent known groups of users and non-users of community pharmacy, none of whom were problem drug users.

RESULTS

Three thematic categories were identified: methadone service users in community pharmacies; attitudes to harm reduction policies; contested space. Harm reduction service expansion has resulted in a high volume of drug users in and around some Scottish pharmacies. Even if harm reduction services are provided discretely users' behavior can differentiate them from other pharmacy users. Drug users' behavior in this setting is commonly perceived to be unacceptable and can deter other consumers from using pharmacy services. The results of this study infer that negative public opinion is highly suggestive of stereotyping and stigmatization of people who use drugs. Participants considered that (1) community pharmacies were unsuitable environments for harm reduction service provision, as they are used by older people and those with children; (2) current drug policy is perceived as ineffective, as abstinence is seldom achieved and methadone was reported to be re-sold; (3) people who use drugs were avoided where possible in community pharmacies.

CONCLUSIONS

Community pharmacy harm reduction services increasingly bring together the public and drug users. Study participants were reluctant to share pharmacy facilities with drug users. This paper concludes by suggesting mechanisms to minimize stigmatization.

摘要

背景

在国际上,社区药房越来越多地参与为滥用非法药物的人提供减少伤害服务和健康建议。

目的

本文考虑了公众对社区药房服务的看法。它讨论了在成瘾和吸毒者污名化的背景下对减少伤害服务的态度。

方法

这项探索性研究涉及来自苏格兰西部的 26 名有目的抽样的公众,他们参加了 5 个焦点小组中的一个。这些小组是由已知的社区药房使用者和非使用者组成的,他们都不是有问题的药物使用者。

结果

确定了三个主题类别:社区药房中的美沙酮服务使用者;对减少伤害政策的态度;有争议的空间。减少伤害服务的扩展导致苏格兰一些药房内和周围有大量的药物使用者。即使提供了减少伤害服务,使用者的行为也可以将他们与其他药房使用者区分开来。在这种环境下,药物使用者的行为通常被认为是不可接受的,可能会阻止其他消费者使用药房服务。这项研究的结果推断,负面的公众意见高度暗示了对吸毒者的刻板印象和污名化。参与者认为:(1)社区药房不适合提供减少伤害服务,因为它们被老年人和有孩子的人使用;(2)目前的毒品政策被认为是无效的,因为很少有人能达到戒毒的目标,而且美沙酮据说被转售;(3)在社区药房,尽可能避免与药物使用者接触。

结论

社区药房的减少伤害服务越来越多地将公众和药物使用者聚集在一起。研究参与者不愿意与药物使用者共享药房设施。本文最后提出了一些机制来最小化污名化。

相似文献

1
Contested space in the pharmacy: public attitudes to pharmacy harm reduction services in the West of Scotland.药店的争议空间:苏格兰西部公众对药店减少伤害服务的态度。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 May-Jun;10(3):576-87. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
2
Community pharmacy harm reduction services for drug misusers: national service delivery and professional attitude development over a decade in Scotland.为药物滥用者提供的社区药房减少伤害服务:苏格兰十年间的全国服务提供与专业态度发展
J Public Health (Oxf). 2007 Dec;29(4):350-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdm064. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
3
A qualitative exploration of opinions on the community pharmacists' role amongst the general public in Scotland.对苏格兰公众对社区药剂师角色看法的定性探索。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2013 Oct;21(5):288-96. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12008. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
4
Community pharmacies and the provision of opioid substitution services for drug misusers: changes in activity and attitudes of community pharmacists across England 1995-2005.社区药房与为药物滥用者提供阿片类药物替代服务:1995 - 2005年英格兰社区药剂师的活动与态度变化
Addiction. 2007 Nov;102(11):1824-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02016.x.
5
How to enhance public health service utilization in community pharmacy?: general public and health providers' perspectives.如何提高社区药房的公共卫生服务利用率?:普通公众和卫生服务提供者的观点。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Mar-Apr;10(2):272-84. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
6
I could take the judgment if you could just provide the service: non-prescription syringe purchase experience at Arizona pharmacies, 2018.如果您能提供服务,我可以承担后果:亚利桑那州药店 2018 年非处方注射器购买体验。
Harm Reduct J. 2019 Sep 18;16(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0327-1.
7
Zoned Out: "NIMBYism", addiction services and municipal governance in British Columbia.分区失效:不列颠哥伦比亚省的“邻避主义”、成瘾服务和市政治理。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):e61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 May 13.
8
Methadone, a contested substance: Danish methadone policy in the 1970s.美沙酮,一种有争议的物质:20 世纪 70 年代的丹麦美沙酮政策。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):e73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
9
The role of policy in community pharmacies' response to injection-drug use: results of a nationwide Canadian survey.政策在社区药房应对注射吸毒问题中的作用:加拿大全国性调查结果
AIDS Public Policy J. 1996 Summer;11(2):78-88.
10
Community pharmacy services for people with drug problems over two decades in Scotland: Implications for future development.二十多年来苏格兰为有药物问题的人提供的社区药房服务:对未来发展的启示。
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Jan;27:105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
"In Sweden you are worthless. In Denmark you get an identity again" - on being perceived and received as a person who uses drugs in different drug policy settings.“在瑞典你一文不值。在丹麦,你又有了身份”——在不同的毒品政策环境中,作为一名吸毒者,被感知和被接纳的感受。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jun 17;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01035-5.
2
Perceptions around medications for opioid use disorder among a diverse sample of U.S. adults.美国成年人多样化样本中阿片类药物使用障碍药物的认知情况。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Aug;163:209361. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209361. Epub 2024 May 3.
3
Harm reduction strategies in acute care for people who use alcohol and/or drugs: A scoping review.
急性医疗中针对使用酒精和/或药物的人群的减少伤害策略:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 15;18(12):e0294804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294804. eCollection 2023.
4
Systematic review on the effects of the physical and social aspects of community pharmacy spaces on service users and staff.系统评价社区药店物理和社会环境对服务使用者和员工的影响。
Perspect Public Health. 2022 Mar;142(2):77-93. doi: 10.1177/17579139221080608.
5
Opioid Use Stigma: An Examination of Student Attitudes on Harm Reduction Strategies.阿片类药物使用污名化:对学生关于减少伤害策略态度的考察。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(6):3381-3397. doi: 10.1007/s11469-022-00756-7. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
6
Treatment-seeking behaviour among people with opioid use disorder in the high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高收入国家阿片类药物使用障碍患者的治疗寻求行为:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 15;16(10):e0258620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258620. eCollection 2021.
7
Digital Health Strategies for Cervical Cancer Control in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review of Current Implementations and Gaps in Research.数字健康策略在中低收入国家宫颈癌防控中的应用:当前实施情况与研究差距的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 27;23(5):e23350. doi: 10.2196/23350.
8
Leveraging the role of community pharmacists in the prevention, surveillance, and treatment of opioid use disorders.发挥社区药剂师在预防、监测和治疗阿片类药物使用障碍方面的作用。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2019 Sep 2;14(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13722-019-0158-0.
9
Community Pharmacy Use by Children across Europe: A Narrative Literature Review.欧洲儿童对社区药房的使用:一篇叙述性文献综述
Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Jun 4;6(2):51. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6020051.