Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 10, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Acad Radiol. 2013 Oct;20(10):1247-55. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.06.003.
In recent years, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) has emerged as a high-resolution modality for vascular exploration in vivo. Several x-ray contrast agents for in vivo imaging are on the market and are based on different formulations. The objective of this study was to compare contrast-related and pharmacokinetic properties of a water-soluble compound containing iomeprol (Iomeron 400) and blood-pool agents (eXIA160XL, AuroVist 15 nm, and ExiTron nano 12000) for the identification of suitable in vivo vascular imaging applications.
Forty-four healthy C57BL/6J mice were used in this study. Iomeprol was administered with a continuous infusion protocol; the other agents as a bolus. Anatomical micro-CT was applied at the head, neck, and lower hind limb before (baseline) and immediately after contrast injection, and used to quantify contrast-related properties of the agents. Dynamic micro-CT was applied at the same regions to characterize the agents pharmacokinetics.
All contrast media revealed safe, except for eXIA160XL, which caused death in four of eight tested animals and was therefore excluded early from the study. AuroVist 15 nm provided the highest attenuation (2.33/mm) as compared to iomeprol (1.97/mm) and ExiTron nano 12000 (1.58/mm) and a maximum temporal variation of contrast of 20% after 30 minutes, but the appearance of a dark skin staining did not allow multiple injections of the agent. Iomeprol passively diffused across capillary membranes, and after 30 minutes doubled the tissue contrast with respect to its initial levels. ExiTron nano 12000 revealed temporal variations of contrast below 10% and significantly reduced clearance rates after the third consecutive injection.
AuroVist 15 nm is best suited for anatomical investigation of the vascular network, while the high extravasation levels of iomeprol can be exploited for perfusion analysis. ExiTron nano 12000 is indicated for use in longitudinal monitoring with repeated injections.
近年来,微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)已成为活体血管研究的一种高分辨率技术。目前已有多种用于活体成像的 X 射线对比剂,其配方各有不同。本研究旨在比较一种包含碘美普尔的水溶性化合物(Iomeron 400)与血池对比剂(eXIA160XL、AuroVist 15nm 和 ExiTron nano 12000)的对比相关特性和药代动力学特性,以确定适合活体血管成像的应用。
本研究共纳入 44 只健康 C57BL/6J 小鼠。采用连续输注方案给予碘美普尔,其余药物则采用推注方式给药。在注射对比剂前(基线)和即刻后,分别对头部、颈部和下肢进行解剖学 micro-CT 检查,以定量评估各对比剂的对比相关特性。同时对同一部位进行动态 micro-CT 检查,以评估各对比剂的药代动力学特性。
除 eXIA160XL 外,所有对比剂均安全,后者在 8 只测试动物中有 4 只死亡,因此早期被排除在外。与碘美普尔(1.97/mm)和 ExiTron nano 12000(1.58/mm)相比,AuroVist 15nm 的衰减值最高(2.33/mm),30 分钟后其对比最大变化幅度为 20%,但由于出现皮肤暗染,无法多次注射该对比剂。碘美普尔可被动扩散穿过毛细血管膜,30 分钟后,其组织对比相对于初始水平增加了 1 倍。ExiTron nano 12000 的对比变化幅度低于 10%,连续 3 次注射后,其清除率明显降低。
AuroVist 15nm 最适合用于血管网络的解剖学研究,而碘美普尔的高外渗水平可用于灌注分析。ExiTron nano 12000 则适合用于多次注射的纵向监测。