Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (A.K., N.R.D., W.H.S., E.M.A., R.J.G., R.L., N.K.C.); Lynn Heart and Vascular Institute, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Boca Raton, FL (A.K.); Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL (A.K.); Aetna, Hartford, CT (L.R.); and CVS Caremark, Woonsocket, RI (T.B.).
Circulation. 2013 Sep 10;128(11 Suppl 1):S219-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000337.
Eliminating out-of-pocket costs for patients after myocardial infarction (MI) improves adherence to preventive therapies and reduces clinical events. Because adherence to medical therapy is low among patients treated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), we evaluated the impact of providing full prescription coverage to this patient subgroup.
The MI Free Rx Event and Economic Evaluation (FREEE) trial randomly assigned 5855 patients with MI to full prescription coverage or usual formulary coverage for all statins, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or angiotensin receptor blockers. We assessed the impact of full prescription coverage on adherence, clinical outcomes, and healthcare costs using adjusted models among the 1052 patients who underwent CABG at the index hospitalization and 4803 who did not. CABG patients were older and had more comorbid illness (P<0.01). After MI, CABG patients were significantly more likely to receive β-blockers and statins but were less likely to receive angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker therapy (P<0.01). Receiving full drug coverage increased rates of adherence to all preventative medications after CABG (all P<0.05). Full coverage was also associated with nonsignificant reductions in the rate of major vascular events or revascularization for patients treated with CABG (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.25) or without CABG (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.06), with no interaction noted (Pint=NS). After CABG, full prescription coverage significantly reduced patient out-of-pocket spending for drugs (P=0.001) without increasing overall health expenditures (P=NS).
Eliminating drug copayments after MI provides consistent benefits to patients treated with or without CABG, leading to increased medication adherence, trends toward improved clinical outcomes, and reduced patient out-of-pocket expenses.
消除心肌梗死(MI)患者的自付费用可以提高预防治疗的依从性并减少临床事件。由于接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗的患者对药物治疗的依从性较低,因此我们评估了为该亚组患者提供全面处方覆盖的影响。
MI 免费 Rx 事件和经济评估(FREEE)试验将 5855 例 MI 患者随机分为全面处方覆盖组或常规药物覆盖组,用于所有他汀类药物、β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂。我们使用调整后的模型评估了在指数住院期间接受 CABG 的 1052 例患者和未接受 CABG 的 4803 例患者中,全面处方覆盖对依从性、临床结局和医疗保健费用的影响。CABG 患者年龄较大,合并症更多(P<0.01)。MI 后,CABG 患者更有可能接受β受体阻滞剂和他汀类药物,但接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗的可能性较小(P<0.01)。接受全面药物覆盖可提高 CABG 后所有预防药物的依从率(均 P<0.05)。全面覆盖也与 CABG 治疗(风险比,0.91;95%置信区间,0.66-1.25)或无 CABG 患者(风险比,0.93;95%置信区间,0.82-1.06)的主要血管事件或血运重建发生率的降低无关(Pint=NS)。在 CABG 后,全面处方覆盖可显著降低患者的药物自付费用(P=0.001),而不会增加总体医疗支出(P=NS)。
MI 后消除药物共付额可使接受 CABG 或不接受 CABG 治疗的患者持续受益,提高药物依从性,改善临床结局趋势,并降低患者的自付费用。