Suppr超能文献

门诊治疗有症状的肺栓塞:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Outpatient treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Thrombosis Program, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2013 Nov;132(5):515-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute deep vein thrombus (DVT) can safely be treated as outpatients. However the role of outpatient treatment in patients diagnosed with a pulmonary embolism (PE) is controversial. We sought to determine the safety of outpatient management of patients with acute symptomatic PE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search strategy was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and all EBM Reviews. Pooled proportions for the different outcomes were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 1258 patients were included in the systematic review. The rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with PE managed as outpatients was 1.47% (95% CI: 0.47 to 3.0%; I(2): 65.4%) during the 3 month follow-up period. The rate of fatal PE was 0.47% (95% CI: 0.16 to 1.0%; I(2): 0%). The rates of major bleeding and fatal intracranial hemorrhage were 0.81% (95% CI: 0.37 to 1.42%; I(2): 0%) and 0.29% (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.68%; I(2): 0%), respectively. The overall 3 month mortality rate was 1.58% (95% CI: 0.71 to 2.80%; I(2): 45%). The event rates were similar if employing risk stratification models versus using clinical gestalt to select appropriate patients for outpatient management.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent of the risk stratification methods used, the rate of adverse events associated with outpatient PE treatment seems low. Based on our systematic review and pooled meta-analysis, low-risk patients with acute PE can safely be treated as outpatients if home circumstances are adequate.

摘要

背景

患有急性深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的患者可以安全地接受门诊治疗。然而,在诊断为肺栓塞(PE)的患者中,门诊治疗的作用存在争议。我们旨在确定门诊治疗急性有症状性 PE 患者的安全性。

材料和方法

采用系统文献检索策略,检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 对照试验登记册和所有 EBM 评价。计算不同结局的汇总比例。

结果

系统评价共纳入 1258 例患者。在 3 个月的随访期间,PE 门诊管理患者的复发性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)发生率为 1.47%(95%CI:0.47 至 3.0%;I²:65.4%)。PE 致死率为 0.47%(95%CI:0.16 至 1.0%;I²:0%)。大出血和致命性颅内出血的发生率分别为 0.81%(95%CI:0.37 至 1.42%;I²:0%)和 0.29%(95%CI:0.06 至 0.68%;I²:0%)。总体 3 个月死亡率为 1.58%(95%CI:0.71 至 2.80%;I²:45%)。如果使用风险分层模型或使用临床判断来选择适合门诊管理的患者,事件发生率相似。

结论

无论使用何种风险分层方法,门诊治疗 PE 相关不良事件的发生率似乎较低。基于我们的系统评价和汇总荟萃分析,低危急性 PE 患者如果家庭情况允许,可以安全地接受门诊治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验