Suppr超能文献

驱避剂处理腕带对三种主要病媒蚊(双翅目:蚊科)的相对功效,在实验室条件下。

Relative efficacy of repellent-treated wristbands against three major mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) vectors of disease, under laboratory conditions.

机构信息

Unit of Vector Biology & Control, Department of Environmental Health Science, College of Medical Sciences and Public Health, Jimma University, P.O. Box No. 378, Jimma, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Int Health. 2009 Dec;1(2):173-7. doi: 10.1016/j.inhe.2009.08.005.

Abstract

A laboratory study was carried out to evaluate the relative efficacy of N-N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET)- and N,N-diethyl phenylacetamide (DEPA)-treated wristbands against three major vector mosquitoes viz., Anopheles stephensi Liston, Culex quinquefasciatus Say and Aedes aegypti (L.), at two different concentrations viz., 1.5 and 2.0 mg/cm(2). Overall, both DEET and DEPA have shown various degrees of repellency impact against all three vector mosquitoes. DEET offered the highest 317.0 min mean complete protection against An. stephensi and DEPA provided 275.6 min complete protection to Cx. quinquefasciatus at 2.0 mg/cm(2). However, DEPA-treated wristbands did not show any significant differences in terms of reduction of human landing rate and mean complete protection time against An. stephensi and Ae. aegypti between 1.5 and 2.0 mg/cm(2). DEET demonstrated relatively higher repellency impact to vector mosquitoes than DEPA. However, χ(2) analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference found in repellent efficiency between DEET and DEPA (P = 0.924). The present study result suggests that repellent-treated wristbands could serve as a means of potential personal protection expedient to avoid insect's annoyance and reduce vector-borne disease transmission. They are extremely valuable whenever and wherever other kinds of personal protection measures are unfeasible.

摘要

一项实验室研究评估了 N,N-二乙基间甲苯酰胺(DEET)和 N,N-二乙基苯乙酰胺(DEPA)处理的腕带对三种主要病媒蚊子,即致倦库蚊、三带喙库蚊和埃及伊蚊的相对功效,两种浓度分别为 1.5 和 2.0mg/cm(2)。总的来说,DEET 和 DEPA 对所有三种病媒蚊子都表现出不同程度的驱避效果。DEET 对 An. stephensi 提供了最高的 317.0 分钟的完全保护,而 DEPA 在 2.0mg/cm(2)时对 Cx. quinquefasciatus 提供了 275.6 分钟的完全保护。然而,DEPA 处理的腕带在降低人接触率和对 An. stephensi 和 Ae. aegypti 的完全保护时间方面,在 1.5 和 2.0mg/cm(2)之间没有显示出任何显著差异。DEET 对病媒蚊子的驱避效果比 DEPA 相对更高。然而,卡方分析显示,DEET 和 DEPA 之间的驱避效率没有统计学上的显著差异(P=0.924)。本研究结果表明,驱避处理的腕带可以作为一种潜在的个人保护手段,以避免昆虫的骚扰和减少媒介传播疾病的传播。在其他种类的个人保护措施不可行的情况下,它们具有极高的价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验