Department of Prosthodontics, Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Dentistry, Kırıkkale, Turkey.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Jul-Aug;21(4):300-6. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130066.
This study investigated the effects of different surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of an autopolymerizing silicone denture liner to a denture base material after thermocycling.
Fifty rectangular heat-polymerized acrylic resin (QC-20) specimens consisting of a set of 2 acrylic blocks were used in the tensile test. Specimens were divided into 5 test groups (n=10) according to the bonding surface treatment as follows: Group A, adhesive treatment (Ufi Gel P adhesive) (control); Group S, sandblasting using 50-µm Al2O3; Group SCSIL, silica coating using 30-µm Al2O3 modified by silica and silanized with silane agent (CoJet System); Group SCA, silica coating and adhesive application; Group SCSILA, silica coating, silane and adhesive treatment. The 2 PMMA blocks were placed into molds and the soft lining materials (Ufi Gel P) were packed into the space and polymerized. All specimens were thermocycled (5,000 cycles) before the tensile test. Bond strength data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and Duncan tests. Fracture surfaces were observed by scanning electron microscopy. X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS) and Fourier Transform Infrared spectrometer (FTIR) analysis were used for the chemical analysis and a profilometer was used for the roughness of the sample surfaces.
The highest bond strength test value was observed for Group A (1.35±0.13); the lowest value was for Group S (0.28±0.07) and Group SCSIL (0.34±0.03). Mixed and cohesive type failures were seen in Group A, SCA and SCSILA. Group S and SCSIL showed the least silicone integrations and the roughest surfaces.
Sandblasting, silica coating and silane surface treatments of the denture base resin did not increase the bond strength of the silicone based soft liner. However, in this study, the chemical analysis and surface profilometer provided interesting insights about the bonding mechanism between the denture base resin and silicone soft liner.
本研究调查了不同表面处理对热循环后自聚合硅橡胶义齿衬垫与义齿基托材料拉伸结合强度的影响。
在拉伸试验中使用了 50 个由一组 2 个丙烯酸块组成的矩形热聚合丙烯酸树脂 (QC-20) 标本。根据粘结表面处理,标本分为 5 个测试组 (n=10),如下:组 A,胶结处理 (Ufi Gel P 胶结剂) (对照组);组 S,用 50-μm Al2O3 喷砂;组 SCSIL,用 30-μm Al2O3 涂覆硅,并用硅烷剂硅烷化 (CoJet 系统);组 SCA,硅涂层和胶结剂应用;组 SCSILA,硅涂层、硅烷和胶结剂处理。将 2 个 PMMA 块放入模具中,将软衬材料 (Ufi Gel P) 填充到空间中并聚合。所有标本在拉伸试验前都经过 5000 次热循环。使用单因素方差分析和 Duncan 检验分析结合强度数据。用扫描电子显微镜观察断裂面。用 X 射线光电子能谱仪 (XPS) 和傅里叶变换红外光谱仪 (FTIR) 进行化学分析,用轮廓仪测量样品表面粗糙度。
组 A 的结合强度测试值最高 (1.35±0.13);组 S (0.28±0.07) 和组 SCSIL (0.34±0.03) 值最低。组 A、SCA 和 SCSILA 出现混合和内聚性失效。组 S 和 SCSIL 显示最少的硅酮整合和最粗糙的表面。
对义齿基托树脂进行喷砂、硅涂层和硅烷表面处理并未增加硅基软衬垫的结合强度。然而,在这项研究中,化学分析和表面轮廓仪提供了关于义齿基托树脂和硅酮软衬垫之间粘结机制的有趣见解。