Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Umeå, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 10;8(9):e73819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073819. eCollection 2013.
Genetic modifications of trees may provide many benefits, e.g. increase production, and mitigate climate change and herbivore impacts on forests. However, genetic modifications sometimes result in unintended effects on innate traits involved in plant-herbivore interactions. The importance of intentional changes in plant defence relative to unintentional changes and the natural variation among clones used in forestry has not been evaluated. By a combination of biochemical measurements and bioassays we investigated if insect feeding on GM aspens is more affected by intentional (induction Bt toxins) than of unintentional, non-target changes or clonal differences in innate plant defence. We used two hybrid wildtype clones (Populus tremula x P. tremuloides and Populus tremula x P. alba) of aspen that have been genetically modified for 1) insect resistance (two Bt lines) or 2) reduced lignin properties (two lines COMT and CAD), respectively. Our measurements of biochemical properties suggest that unintended changes by GM modifications (occurring due to events in the transformation process) in innate plant defence (phenolic compounds) were generally smaller but fundamentally different than differences seen among different wildtype clones (e.g. quantitative and qualitative, respectively). However, neither clonal differences between the two wildtype clones nor unintended changes in phytochemistry influenced consumption by the leaf beetle (Phratora vitellinae). By contrast, Bt induction had a strong direct intended effect as well as a post experiment effect on leaf beetle consumption. The latter suggested lasting reduction of beetle fitness following Bt exposure that is likely due to intestinal damage suffered by the initial Bt exposure. We conclude that Bt induction clearly have intended effects on a target species. Furthermore, the effect of unintended changes in innate plant defence traits, when they occur, are context dependent and have in comparison to Bt induction probably less pronounced effect on targeted herbivores.
树木的基因改造可能会带来许多好处,例如增加产量,并减轻气候变化和食草动物对森林的影响。然而,基因改造有时会对涉及植物-食草动物相互作用的固有特征产生意想不到的影响。相对于非故意的变化和林业中使用的克隆之间的自然变异,植物防御的有意变化的重要性尚未得到评估。通过生化测量和生物测定的结合,我们研究了昆虫对 GM 白杨的取食是否更容易受到有意(诱导 Bt 毒素)的影响,而不是受到非故意的、非目标的变化或内在植物防御的克隆差异的影响。我们使用了两种已遗传改良的杂交野生型白杨克隆(Populus tremula x P. tremuloides 和 Populus tremula x P. alba),一种用于 1)抗虫(两种 Bt 株系),另一种用于 2)降低木质素特性(两种 COMT 和 CAD 株系)。我们对生化特性的测量表明,GM 修饰(由于转化过程中的事件而发生)引起的内在植物防御(酚类化合物)的非故意变化通常较小,但从根本上与不同野生型克隆之间的差异不同(例如,分别是定量和定性的)。然而,两个野生型克隆之间的克隆差异以及植物化学物质的非故意变化都没有影响叶甲(Phratora vitellinae)的取食。相比之下,Bt 诱导对叶甲的取食既有直接的预期作用,也有实验后的作用。后一种作用表明,Bt 暴露后叶甲的适应性持续降低,这可能是由于初始 Bt 暴露导致肠道受损。我们得出结论,Bt 诱导对目标物种有明显的预期作用。此外,当内在植物防御特征发生非故意变化时,其影响是上下文相关的,与 Bt 诱导相比,对目标食草动物的影响可能不那么明显。