Suppr超能文献

泰国药师参与华法林治疗管理的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of pharmacist-participated warfarin therapy management in Thailand.

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Department of Pharmaceutical Care, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand; Center of Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research (CPOR), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2013 Oct;132(4):437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Sep 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although pharmacist-participated warfarin therapy management (PWTM) is well established, the economic evaluation of PWTM is still lacking particularly in Asia-Pacific region. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of PWTM in Thailand using local data where available.

METHODS

A Markov model was used to compare lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) accrued to patients receiving warfarin therapy through PWTM or usual care (UC). The model was populated with relevant information from both health care system and societal perspectives. Input data were obtained from literatures and database analyses. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were presented as year 2012 values. A base-case analysis was performed for patients at age 45 years old. Sensitivity analyses including one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were constructed to determine the robustness of the findings.

RESULTS

From societal perspective, PWTM and UC results in 39.5 and 38.7 QALY, respectively. Thus, PWTM increase QALY by 0.79, and increase costs by 92,491 THB (3,083 USD) compared with UC (ICER 116,468 THB [3,882.3 USD] per QALY gained). While, from health care system perspective, PWTM also results in 0.79 QALY, and increase costs by 92,788 THB (3,093 USD) compared with UC (ICER 116,842 THB [3,894.7 USD] per QALY gained). Thus, PWTM was cost-effective compared with usual care, assuming willingness-to-pay (WTP) of 150,000 THB/QALY. Results were sensitive to the discount rate and cost of clinic set-up.

CONCLUSION

Our finding suggests that PWTM is a cost-effective intervention. Policy-makers may consider our finding as part of information in their decision-making for implementing this strategy into healthcare benefit package. Further updates when additional data available are needed.

摘要

简介

尽管药师参与的华法林治疗管理(PWTM)已经得到广泛认可,但在亚太地区,PWTM 的经济评估仍然缺乏。本研究的目的是使用当地数据(如有)来评估泰国 PWTM 的成本效益。

方法

使用马尔可夫模型比较接受 PWTM 或常规护理(UC)的患者的终生成本和获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)。该模型从医疗保健系统和社会角度填充了相关信息。输入数据来自文献和数据库分析。增量成本效益比(ICER)以 2012 年的价值表示。对 45 岁的患者进行了基础案例分析。进行了单因素和概率敏感性分析,以确定研究结果的稳健性。

结果

从社会角度来看,PWTM 和 UC 分别导致 39.5 和 38.7 个 QALY。因此,PWTM 比 UC 增加 0.79 个 QALY,增加 92491 泰铢(3083 美元)的成本(ICER 为每获得一个 QALY 增加 116468 泰铢[3882.3 美元])。然而,从医疗保健系统的角度来看,PWTM 也导致 0.79 个 QALY,增加 92788 泰铢(3093 美元)的成本,与 UC 相比(ICER 为每获得一个 QALY 增加 116842 泰铢[3894.7 美元])。因此,PWTM 与常规护理相比具有成本效益,假设愿意支付的价格(WTP)为 150000 泰铢/QALY。结果对贴现率和诊所设立成本敏感。

结论

我们的研究结果表明 PWTM 是一种具有成本效益的干预措施。决策者可能会考虑我们的研究结果作为他们在制定将这一策略纳入医疗保健福利方案的决策时的参考信息。当有更多数据可用时,需要进一步更新。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验