Dr. Anthony K. C. Chan, Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute (TaARI), DBCVSRI, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8L 2X2, Tel: 905 521 2100 (Ext. 40719), Fax: 905 577 1427, E-mail:
Thromb Haemost. 2013 Dec;110(6):1180-8. doi: 10.1160/TH13-04-0290. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is used as an adjunct during thrombolytic therapy. However, its use is associated with limitations, such as the inability to inhibit surface bound coagulation factors. We have developed a covalent conjugate of antithrombin (AT) and heparin (ATH) with superior anticoagulant properties compared with UFH. Advantages of ATH include enhanced inhibition of surface-bound coagulation enzymes and the ability to reduce the overall size and mass of clots in vivo. The interactions of UFH or ATH with the components of the fibrinolytic pathway are not well understood. Our study utilised discontinuous second order rate constant (k₂) assays to compare the rates of inhibition of free and fibrin-associated plasmin by AT+UFH vs ATH. Additionally, we evaluated the effects of AT+UFH and ATH on plasmin generation in the presence of fibrin. The k₂ values for inhibition of plasmin were 5.74 ± 0.28 x 10⁶ M⁻¹ min⁻¹ and 6.39 ± 0.59 x 10⁶ M⁻¹ min⁻¹ for AT+UFH and ATH, respectively. In the presence of fibrin, the k₂ values decreased to 1.45 ± 0.10 x 10⁶ M⁻¹ min⁻¹ and 3.07 ± 0.19 x 10⁶ M⁻¹ min⁻¹ for AT+UFH and ATH, respectively. Therefore, protection of plasmin by fibrin was observed for both inhibitors; however, ATH demonstrated superior inhibition of fibrin-associated plasmin. Rates of plasmin generation were also decreased by both inhibitors, with ATH causing the greatest reduction (approx. 38-fold). Nonetheless, rates of plasmin inhibition were 2-3 orders of magnitude lower than for thrombin, and in a plasma-based clot lysis assay ATH significantly inhibited clot formation but had little impact on clot lysis. Cumulatively, these data may indicate that, relative to coagulant enzymes, the fibrinolytic system is spared from inhibition by both AT+UFH and ATH, limiting reduction in fibrinolytic potential during anticoagulant therapy.
未分级肝素 (UFH) 被用作溶栓治疗的辅助药物。然而,其使用存在局限性,例如无法抑制表面结合的凝血因子。我们已经开发出一种抗凝血酶 (AT) 和肝素 (ATH) 的共价缀合物,与 UFH 相比具有更好的抗凝特性。ATH 的优点包括增强对表面结合的凝血酶的抑制作用,以及能够减少体内血栓的整体大小和质量。UFH 或 ATH 与纤维蛋白溶解途径的成分之间的相互作用尚未得到很好的理解。我们的研究利用不连续二级速率常数 (k₂) 测定法来比较 AT+UFH 与 ATH 对游离和纤维蛋白结合的纤溶酶的抑制率。此外,我们评估了 AT+UFH 和 ATH 对纤维蛋白存在时纤溶酶生成的影响。抑制纤溶酶的 k₂ 值分别为 AT+UFH 和 ATH 的 5.74 ± 0.28 x 10⁶ M⁻¹ min⁻¹ 和 6.39 ± 0.59 x 10⁶ M⁻¹ min⁻¹。在纤维蛋白存在的情况下,k₂ 值分别降至 AT+UFH 和 ATH 的 1.45 ± 0.10 x 10⁶ M⁻¹ min⁻¹ 和 3.07 ± 0.19 x 10⁶ M⁻¹ min⁻¹。因此,两种抑制剂均观察到纤溶酶被纤维蛋白保护;然而,ATH 对纤维蛋白结合的纤溶酶表现出更好的抑制作用。两种抑制剂均降低了纤溶酶的生成率,其中 ATH 引起的降低最大(约 38 倍)。尽管如此,纤溶酶抑制率比凝血酶低 2-3 个数量级,并且在基于血浆的血栓溶解测定中,ATH 显著抑制血栓形成,但对血栓溶解几乎没有影响。总的来说,这些数据可能表明,相对于凝血酶,纤维蛋白溶解系统免受 AT+UFH 和 ATH 的抑制,从而限制了抗凝治疗期间纤维蛋白溶解潜力的降低。