Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Sep 22;14:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-37.
Medical tourism-the practice where patients travel internationally to privately access medical care-may limit patients' regular physicians' abilities to contribute to the informed decision-making process. We address this issue by examining ways in which Canadian family doctors' typical involvement in patients' informed decision-making is challenged when their patients engage in medical tourism.
Focus groups were held with family physicians practicing in British Columbia, Canada. After receiving ethics approval, letters of invitation were faxed to family physicians in six cities. 22 physicians agreed to participate and focus groups ranged from two to six participants. Questions explored participants' perceptions of and experiences with medical tourism. A coding scheme was created using inductive and deductive codes that captured issues central to analytic themes identified by the investigators. Extracts of the coded data that dealt with informed decision-making were shared among the investigators in order to identify themes. Four themes were identified, all of which dealt with the challenges that medical tourism poses to family physicians' abilities to support medical tourists' informed decision-making. Findings relevant to each theme were contrasted against the existing medical tourism literature so as to assist in understanding their significance.
Four key challenges were identified: 1) confusion and tensions related to the regular domestic physician's role in decision-making; 2) tendency to shift responsibility related to healthcare outcomes onto the patient because of the regular domestic physician's reduced role in shared decision-making; 3) strains on the patient-physician relationship and corresponding concern around the responsibility of the foreign physician; and 4) regular domestic physicians' concerns that treatments sought abroad may not be based on the best available medical evidence on treatment efficacy.
Medical tourism is creating new challenges for Canadian family physicians who now find themselves needing to carefully negotiate their roles and responsibilities in the informed decision-making process of their patients who decide to seek private treatment abroad as medical tourists. These physicians can and should be educated to enable their patients to look critically at the information available about medical tourism providers and to ask critical questions of patients deciding to access care abroad.
医疗旅游——患者跨国寻求私人医疗服务的行为——可能限制患者的常规医生参与知情决策的能力。我们通过研究当患者进行医疗旅游时,加拿大家庭医生通常如何参与患者的知情决策,来解决这个问题。
在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省进行了家庭医生的焦点小组。在获得伦理批准后,向六个城市的家庭医生传真了邀请信。22 名医生同意参加,焦点小组的参与者人数从两人到六人不等。问题探讨了参与者对医疗旅游的看法和经验。使用归纳和演绎代码创建了一个编码方案,该方案捕获了调查员确定的分析主题的核心问题。与知情决策相关的编码数据的摘录在调查员之间共享,以确定主题。确定了四个主题,都涉及到医疗旅游对家庭医生支持医疗游客知情决策能力的挑战。与现有的医疗旅游文献相对照,提取了与每个主题相关的发现,以帮助理解其意义。
确定了四个关键挑战:1)与常规国内医生在决策中的角色相关的困惑和紧张;2)由于常规国内医生在共同决策中的作用减少,倾向于将医疗保健结果的责任转移到患者身上;3)患者-医生关系的紧张以及对外国医生责任的担忧;4)常规国内医生担心在国外寻求的治疗可能不是基于最佳的治疗效果的现有医疗证据。
医疗旅游给加拿大家庭医生带来了新的挑战,他们现在发现自己需要在决定作为医疗游客到国外寻求私人治疗的患者的知情决策过程中仔细协商自己的角色和责任。这些医生可以而且应该接受教育,使他们的患者能够批判性地看待有关医疗旅游提供者的可用信息,并向决定在国外获得治疗的患者提出关键问题。