Department of Urology, Alexianer Hospital Maria Hilf GmbH, Krefeld, Germany.
BJU Int. 2014 Mar;113(3):429-36. doi: 10.1111/bju.12437.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with sorafenib, a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced urothelial cancer.
The study was a randomized phase II trial. Its primary aim was to show an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.5 months by adding sorafenib to conventional chemotherapy. Secondary objectives were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. The patients included in the trial had histologically confirmed locally advanced and/or metastatic urothelial cancer of the bladder or upper urinary tract. Chemotherapy with gemcitabine (1250 mg/qm on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (70 mg/qm on day 1) repeated every 21 days, was administered to all patients in a double-blind randomization of additional sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) vs placebo (two tablets twice daily) on days 3-21. Treatment continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity, the maximum number of cycles was limited to eight. The response assessment was repeated after every two cycles.
Between October 2006 and October 2010, 98 of 132 planned patients were recruited. Nine patients were ineligible. The final analysis included 40 patients in the sorafenib and 49 patients in the placebo arm. There were no significant differences between the two arms concerning ORR (sorafenib: complete response [CR] 12.5%, partial response [PR] 40%; placebo: CR 12%, PR 35%), median PFS (sorafenib: 6.3 months, placebo: 6.1 months) or OS (sorafenib: 11.3 months, placebo: 10.6 months). Toxicity was moderately higher in the sorafenib arm. Diarrrhoea occurred significantly more often in the sorafenib arm and hand-foot syndrome occurred only in the sorafenib arm. The study was closed prematurely because of slow recruitment.
Although the addition of sorafenib to standard chemotherapy showed acceptable toxicity, the trial failed to show a 4.5 months improvement in PFS.
评估吉西他滨和顺铂联合索拉非尼(一种酪氨酸激酶抑制剂)与单纯化疗相比作为晚期尿路上皮癌一线治疗的疗效和安全性。
这是一项随机的 II 期临床试验。其主要目的是通过添加索拉非尼来改善无进展生存期(PFS),改善 4.5 个月。次要目标是客观缓解率(ORR)、总生存期(OS)和毒性。试验纳入的患者为组织学证实的局部晚期和/或转移性膀胱癌或上尿路尿路上皮癌。所有患者均接受吉西他滨(1250mg/m²,第 1 和 8 天)和顺铂(70mg/m²,第 1 天)每 21 天重复一次的化疗,同时在第 3-21 天进行双盲随机分组,接受索拉非尼(400mg,每日 2 次)或安慰剂(每日 2 次,每次 2 片)治疗。治疗持续到进展或不可接受的毒性,最大周期数限制为 8 个。每 2 个周期重复一次反应评估。
2006 年 10 月至 2010 年 10 月,计划入组的 132 例患者中,9 例不符合条件。最终分析包括索拉非尼组 40 例和安慰剂组 49 例。两组之间在 ORR(索拉非尼:完全缓解 [CR] 12.5%,部分缓解 [PR] 40%;安慰剂:CR 12%,PR 35%)、中位 PFS(索拉非尼:6.3 个月,安慰剂:6.1 个月)或 OS(索拉非尼:11.3 个月,安慰剂:10.6 个月)方面无显著差异。索拉非尼组毒性中度较高。腹泻在索拉非尼组更常见,手足综合征仅在索拉非尼组发生。由于招募速度缓慢,该研究提前结束。
尽管在标准化疗中添加索拉非尼显示出可接受的毒性,但试验未能显示 PFS 改善 4.5 个月。