Suppr超能文献

剖宫产术后伤口裂开的危险因素。

Risk factors for wound disruption following cesarean delivery.

作者信息

Subramaniam Akila, Jauk Victoria C, Figueroa Dana, Biggio Joseph R, Owen John, Tita Alan T N

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, AL , USA.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Aug;27(12):1237-40. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.850487. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Risk factors for post-cesarean wound infection, but not disruption, are well-described in the literature. The primary objective of this study was to identify risk factors for non-infectious post-cesarean wound disruption.

METHODS

Secondary analysis was conducted using data from a single-center randomized controlled trial of staple versus suture skin closure in women ≥24 weeks' gestation undergoing cesarean delivery. Wound disruption was defined as subcutaneous skin or fascial dehiscence excluding primary wound infections. Composite wound morbidity (disruption or infection) was examined as a secondary outcome. Patient demographics, medical co-morbidities, and intrapartum characteristics were evaluated as potential risk factors using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 398 randomized patients, 340, including 26 with disruptions (7.6%) met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. After multivariable adjustments, African-American race (aOR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1-13.8) and staple - as opposed to suture - wound closure (aOR 5.4, 95% CI 1.8-16.1) remained significant risk factors for disruption; non-significant increases were observed for body mass index ≥30 (aOR 2.1, 95% CI 0.6-7.5), but not for diabetes mellitus (aOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.3-2.9). RESULTS for composite wound morbidity were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin closure with staples, African-American race, and considering the relatively small sample size, potentially obesity are associated with increased risk of non-infectious post-cesarean wound disruption.

摘要

目的

剖宫产术后伤口感染而非裂开的危险因素在文献中已有详尽描述。本研究的主要目的是确定剖宫产术后非感染性伤口裂开的危险因素。

方法

采用来自一项单中心随机对照试验的数据进行二次分析,该试验对比了妊娠≥24周行剖宫产的女性使用吻合钉与缝线进行皮肤缝合的效果。伤口裂开定义为皮下皮肤或筋膜裂开,不包括原发性伤口感染。将复合伤口并发症(裂开或感染)作为次要结局进行研究。使用多变量逻辑回归评估患者人口统计学特征、合并症和产时特征作为潜在危险因素。

结果

398例随机分组的患者中,340例符合纳入标准并进行分析,其中26例出现伤口裂开(7.6%)。经过多变量调整后,非裔美国人种族(调整后比值比[aOR] 3.9,95%置信区间[CI] 1.1 - 13.8)以及使用吻合钉而非缝线进行伤口缝合(aOR 5.4,95% CI 1.8 - 16.1)仍然是伤口裂开的显著危险因素;体重指数≥30有非显著升高(aOR 2.1,95% CI 0.6 - 7.5),但糖尿病并非危险因素(aOR 0.9,95% CI 0.3 - 2.9)。复合伤口并发症的结果相似。

结论

使用吻合钉进行皮肤缝合、非裔美国人种族,以及考虑到样本量相对较小,潜在的肥胖与剖宫产术后非感染性伤口裂开风险增加相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验