The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, Pisa 56127, Italy.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Oct 5;10:103. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-103.
After a stroke, patients show significant modifications of neural control of movement, such as abnormal muscle co-activation, and reduced selectivity and modulation of muscle activity. Nonetheless, results reported in literature do not allow to unequivocally explain whether and, in case, how a cerebrovascular accident affects muscle synergies underlying the control of the upper limb. These discrepancies suggest that a complete understanding of the modular re-organization of muscle activity due to a stroke is still lacking. This pilot study aimed at investigating the effects of the conjunction between the natural ongoing of the pathology and the intense robot-mediated treatment on muscle synergies of the paretic upper limb of subacute post-stroke patients.
Six subacute patients, homogenous with respect to the age and the time elapsed from the trauma, and ten healthy age-matched subjects were enrolled. The protocol consisted in achieving planar movement of the upper limb while handling the end-effector of a robotic platform. Patients underwent 6 weeks long treatment while clinical scores, kinematics of the end-effector and muscle activity were recorded. Then we verified whether muscle coordination underlying the motor task was significantly affected by the cerebrovascular accident and how muscle synergies were modified along the treatment.
Results show that although muscle synergies in subacute stroke patients were qualitatively comparable to those of healthy subjects, those underlying the movement of the shoulder can reflect the functional deficit induced by the pathology. Moreover, the improvement of motor performance due to the treatment was achieved in conjunction with slight modifications of muscle synergies. In this regard, modifications of muscle synergies appeared to be influenced by the different recovering mechanisms across patients presumably due to the heterogeneity of lesions, sides and location of the accident.
The results support the hypothesis that muscle synergies reflect the injury of the cerebrovascular accident and could document the effects of the functional recovery due to a suitable and customized treatment. Therefore, they open up new possibilities for the development of more effective neuro-rehabilitation protocols.
中风后,患者的运动神经控制会发生明显变化,例如肌肉异常协同收缩,以及肌肉活动的选择性和调制能力降低。然而,文献中的结果并不能明确解释中风是否以及在何种情况下会影响控制上肢运动的肌肉协同作用。这些差异表明,我们仍然缺乏对中风导致的肌肉活动模块化重新组织的全面理解。这项初步研究旨在探讨病理自然进展与高强度机器人介导治疗相结合对亚急性中风后患者患侧上肢肌肉协同作用的影响。
共纳入 6 名亚急性患者和 10 名年龄匹配的健康受试者。方案包括在上肢末端执行器上实现平面运动,同时记录患者的临床评分、末端执行器的运动学和肌肉活动。然后,我们验证了运动任务的肌肉协调是否受到中风的显著影响,以及肌肉协同作用如何随着治疗而改变。
结果表明,尽管亚急性中风患者的肌肉协同作用在质量上与健康受试者相似,但那些与肩部运动相关的肌肉协同作用可以反映出该疾病引起的功能缺陷。此外,治疗引起的运动性能的提高是与肌肉协同作用的轻微变化相结合的。在这方面,肌肉协同作用的变化似乎受到不同患者恢复机制的影响,这可能是由于病变、损伤部位和损伤侧的异质性造成的。
这些结果支持了肌肉协同作用反映中风损伤的假设,并可能记录因适当和定制化治疗而导致的功能恢复的效果。因此,它们为开发更有效的神经康复方案开辟了新的可能性。