• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率显著降低。

Marked reduction in mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Departments of Public Health and.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;119(6):1583-90. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS13276. Epub 2013 Oct 8.

DOI:10.3171/2013.8.JNS13276
PMID:24098983
Abstract

OBJECT

In spite of evidence that use of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (Guidelines) would dramatically reduce morbidity and mortality, adherence to these Guidelines remains variable across trauma centers. The authors analyzed 2-week mortality due to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) from 2001 through 2009 in New York State and examined the trends in adherence to the Guidelines.

METHODS

The authors calculated trends in adherence to the Guidelines and age-adjusted 2-week mortality rates between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2009. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of time period on case-fatality. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor insertion was modeled in a 2-level hierarchical model using generalized linear mixed effects to allow for clustering by different centers.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2009, the case-fatality rate decreased from 22% to 13% (p < 0.0001), a change that remained significant after adjusting for factors that independently predict mortality (adjusted OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39-0.70; p < 0.0001). Guidelines adherence increased, with the percentage of patients with ICP monitoring increasing from 56% to 75% (p < 0.0001). Adherence to cerebral perfusion pressure treatment thresholds increased from 15% to 48% (p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients having an ICP elevation greater than 25 mm Hg dropped from 42% to 29% (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant reduction in TBI mortality between 2001 and 2009 in New York State. Increase in Guidelines adherence occurred at the same time as the pronounced decrease in 2-week mortality and decreased rate of intracranial hypertension, suggesting a causal relationship between Guidelines adherence and improved outcomes. Our findings warrant future investigation to identify methods for increasing and sustaining adherence to evidence-based Guidelines recommendations.

摘要

目的

尽管有证据表明,使用《颅脑创伤基金会严重颅脑创伤管理指南》(Guidelines)将显著降低发病率和死亡率,但这些指南在各创伤中心的应用仍存在差异。作者分析了 2001 年至 2009 年纽约州严重颅脑创伤(TBI)的两周死亡率,并研究了指南应用的变化趋势。

方法

作者计算了 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 31 日期间对指南的遵循情况和年龄调整后两周死亡率的变化趋势。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来评估时间段对病死率的影响。采用两水平分层模型对颅内压(ICP)监测仪插入进行建模,采用广义线性混合效应来允许不同中心的聚类。

结果

2001 年至 2009 年,病死率从 22%降至 13%(p < 0.0001),调整了独立预测死亡率的因素后,这一变化仍然显著(调整后的 OR 0.52,95%CI 0.39-0.70;p < 0.0001)。指南的遵循率增加,ICP 监测的患者比例从 56%增加到 75%(p < 0.0001)。脑灌注压治疗阈值的遵循率从 15%增加到 48%(p < 0.0001)。ICP 升高超过 25mmHg 的患者比例从 42%降至 29%(p = 0.0001)。

结论

纽约州 2001 年至 2009 年 TBI 死亡率显著降低。指南的应用增加与 2 周死亡率显著下降和颅内高血压发生率下降同时发生,提示指南应用与结局改善之间存在因果关系。我们的研究结果值得进一步研究,以确定增加和维持对循证指南建议的遵循的方法。

相似文献

1
Marked reduction in mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率显著降低。
J Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;119(6):1583-90. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS13276. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
2
Increased mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated without intracranial pressure monitoring.未行颅内压监测的严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率增高。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Oct;117(4):729-34. doi: 10.3171/2012.7.JNS111816. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
3
Compliance With Evidence-Based Guidelines and Interhospital Variation in Mortality for Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者的循证指南依从性与医院间死亡率的差异。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Oct;150(10):965-72. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1678.
4
Marked improvement in adherence to traumatic brain injury guidelines in United States trauma centers.美国创伤中心对创伤性脑损伤指南的遵循情况有显著改善。
J Trauma. 2007 Oct;63(4):841-7; discussion 847-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318123fc21.
5
Response to intracranial hypertension treatment as a predictor of death in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.颅内高压治疗反应作为严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡的预测因素。
J Neurosurg. 2011 May;114(5):1471-8. doi: 10.3171/2010.11.JNS101116. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
6
Intracranial pressure monitoring and inpatient mortality in severe traumatic brain injury: A propensity score-matched analysis.颅内压监测与严重创伤性脑损伤患者住院死亡率:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Mar;78(3):492-501; discussion 501-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000559.
7
Brain tissue oxygen monitoring in traumatic brain injury and major trauma: outcome analysis of a brain tissue oxygen-directed therapy.创伤性脑损伤和严重创伤中的脑组织氧监测:脑组织氧导向治疗的结果分析
J Neurosurg. 2009 Oct;111(4):672-82. doi: 10.3171/2009.4.JNS081150.
8
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.
9
An analysis of Brain Trauma Foundation traumatic brain injury guideline compliance and patient outcome.对脑创伤基金会创伤性脑损伤指南依从性及患者预后的分析。
Injury. 2015 May;46(5):854-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.023. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
10
Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe head injury: compliance with Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines and effect on outcomes: a prospective study.严重颅脑损伤患者的颅内压监测:遵循颅脑创伤基金会指南与结局的关系:一项前瞻性研究。
J Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;119(5):1248-54. doi: 10.3171/2013.7.JNS122255. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Inflammation and the Development of Cerebral Ischaemia and Hypoxia in Traumatic Brain Injury-A Narrative Review.创伤性脑损伤中炎症与脑缺血缺氧发展的关系——一项叙述性综述
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 20;26(16):8066. doi: 10.3390/ijms26168066.
2
Continuous personalized cerebrovascular reactivity-based physiologic metrics in neurocritical care: a narrative review of the current landscape, limitations, and future directions.神经重症监护中基于持续个性化脑血管反应性的生理指标:对当前现状、局限性及未来方向的叙述性综述
Front Physiol. 2025 May 6;16:1582813. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1582813. eCollection 2025.
3
Traumatic Brain Injury Guideline Implementation at a University Hospital in Saudi Arabia.
沙特阿拉伯某大学医院的创伤性脑损伤指南实施情况
Life (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;15(3):369. doi: 10.3390/life15030369.
4
Development of a Quality Indicator Set for the Optimal Acute Management of Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Australian Context.澳大利亚背景下中重度创伤性脑损伤最佳急性管理质量指标集的制定
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr;42(2):485-494. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02107-x. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
5
Trends in mortality rates and correlations between intracranial injuries and external causes: A Japanese population study.死亡率趋势与颅内损伤和外部原因之间的相关性:一项日本人群研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 8;19(5):e0300846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300846. eCollection 2024.
6
The Effects of Neuromonitoring and Cerebrolysin Administration on Outcomes in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury-An Interventional Pilot Study.神经监测和脑蛋白水解物给药对创伤性脑损伤患者预后的影响——一项干预性初步研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 8;13(2):353. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020353.
7
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Treatment Thresholds in Acute Neural Injury: A Narrative Review of the Historical Achievements, Current State, and Future Perspectives.急性神经损伤中的颅内压监测与治疗阈值:历史成就、现状及未来展望的叙述性综述
Neurotrauma Rep. 2023 Aug 7;4(1):478-494. doi: 10.1089/neur.2023.0031. eCollection 2023.
8
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Acute Brain Injured Patients: When, How, What Should We Monitor.急性脑损伤患者的颅内压监测:何时、如何以及我们应该监测什么。
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jun 28;19(2):149-161. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e32. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Multimodal and autoregulation monitoring in the neurointensive care unit.神经重症监护病房中的多模态和自动调节监测
Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 20;14:1155986. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1155986. eCollection 2023.
10
Current Status of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Korea : A Post Hoc Analysis of Korea Neurotrauma Databank Project with a Nationwide Survey.韩国重型颅脑损伤患者颅内压监测的现状:韩国神经创伤数据库项目的事后分析及全国性调查
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2023 Aug;66(5):543-551. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2023.0019. Epub 2023 Apr 4.