State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Jan 15;468-469:1103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.084. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
Ambient organic carbon (OC) to elemental carbon (EC) ratios are strongly associated with not only the radiative forcing due to aerosols but also the extent of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation. An inter-comparison study was conducted based on fine particulate matter samples collected during summer in Beijing to investigate the influence of the thermal-optical temperature protocol on the OC to EC ratio. Five temperature protocols were used such that the NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) and EUSAAR (European Supersites for Atmospheric Aerosol Research) protocols were run by the Sunset carbon analyzer while the IMPROVE (the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments network)-A protocol and two alternative protocols designed based on NIOSH and EUSAAR were run by the DRI analyzer. The optical attenuation measured by the Sunset carbon analyzer was more easily biased by the shadowing effect, whereas total carbon agreed well between the Sunset and DRI analyzers. The EC(IMPROVE-A) (EC measured by the IMPROVE-A protocol; similar hereinafter) to EC(NIOSH) ratio and the EC(IMPROVE-A) to EC(EUSAAR) ratio averaged 1.36 ± 0.21 and 0.91 ± 0.10, respectively, both of which exhibited little dependence on the biomass burning contribution. Though the temperature protocol had substantial influence on the OC to EC ratio, the contributions of secondary organic carbon (SOC) to OC, which were predicted by the EC-tracer method, did not differ significantly among the five protocols. Moreover, the SOC contributions obtained in this study were comparable with previous results based on field observation (typically between 45 and 65%), but were substantially higher than the estimation provided by an air quality model (only 18%). The comparison of SOC and WSOC suggests that when using the transmittance charring correction, all of the three common protocols (i.e., IMPROVE-A, NIOSH and EUSAAR) could be reliable for the estimation of SOC by the EC-tracer method.
环境有机碳 (OC) 与元素碳 (EC) 的比值不仅与气溶胶的辐射强迫密切相关,而且还与二次有机气溶胶 (SOA) 的形成程度有关。本研究基于夏季在北京采集的细颗粒物样品,开展了一项相互比较研究,以考察热光温度程序对 OC 与 EC 比值的影响。研究使用了 5 种温度程序,其中 NIOSH(美国国家职业安全与健康研究所)和 EUSAAR(欧洲大气气溶胶研究超级站点)程序由 Sunset 碳分析仪运行,而 IMPROVE(受保护视觉环境网络的机构间监测)-A 程序和 2 种基于 NIOSH 和 EUSAAR 设计的替代程序则由 DRI 分析仪运行。Sunset 碳分析仪测量的光衰减更容易受到阴影效应的影响,而 Sunset 和 DRI 分析仪之间的总碳则吻合较好。EC(IMPROVE-A)(通过 IMPROVE-A 协议测量的 EC;以下相同)与 EC(NIOSH)的比值和 EC(IMPROVE-A)与 EC(EUSAAR)的比值平均分别为 1.36±0.21 和 0.91±0.10,两者均与生物质燃烧的贡献关系不大。尽管温度程序对 OC 与 EC 比值有很大的影响,但通过 EC 示踪剂法预测的二次有机碳 (SOC) 对 OC 的贡献在 5 种程序中并没有显著差异。此外,本研究获得的 SOC 贡献与以往基于实地观测的结果相当(通常在 45%至 65%之间),但明显高于空气质量模型的估计值(仅为 18%)。SOC 和 WSOC 的比较表明,在使用透射率碳化校正时,通过 EC 示踪剂法估算 SOC 时,所有三种常见的协议(即 IMPROVE-A、NIOSH 和 EUSAAR)都可以是可靠的。