Li Song, Yu Fa-Hong
Kunming Natural History Museum of Zoology, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China.
Dongwuxue Yanjiu. 2013 Oct;34(E4-5):E120-7.
There is some discrepancy in the classification of different species of Hylopetes, particularly regarding systematic status of H. electilis and H. phayrei and their relationship to other species. In the present study, for the first time we have brought together six of the nine Hylopetes species and performed statistical analysis of 14 measurable cranial variables, analyzing in total 89 specimens, including H. electilis, H. alboniger, H. phayrei, H. lepidus, H. spadiceus, and H. nigripes. Both univariate and multivariate analysis results indicate that H. electilis can not only be obviously distinguished from H. phayrei, but also clearly differs from the other four Hylopetes species. These results sustain the contention that H. electilis is neither a synonym nor subspecies of H. phayrei,but should be considered a distinct and valid species. Subsequently, a straightforward discussion on the biogeography of Hylopetes in southeastern Asia gives further insight into the differentiation and variety of species belonging to this genus. There is some discrepancy in the classification of different species of particularly regarding systematic status of and and their relationship to other species. In the present study, for the first time we have brought together six of the nine speciesand performed statistical analysis of 14 measurable cranial variables, analyzing in total 89 specimens, including , , , , , and . Both univariate and multivariate analysis results indicate that can not only be obviously distinguished from , but also clearly differs from the other four species. These results sustain the contention that is neither a synonym nor subspecies of ,but should be considered a distinct and valid species. Subsequently, a straightforward discussion on the biogeography of in southeastern Asia gives further insight into the differentiation and variety of species belonging to this genus.
不同种类的鼯鼠(Hylopetes)在分类上存在一些差异,特别是关于黑腹鼯鼠(H. electilis)和菲氏鼯鼠(H. phayrei)的系统地位以及它们与其他物种的关系。在本研究中,我们首次汇集了九种鼯鼠中的六种,并对14个可测量的颅骨变量进行了统计分析,总共分析了89个标本,包括黑腹鼯鼠、白颊鼯鼠(H. alboniger)、菲氏鼯鼠、鳞足鼯鼠(H. lepidus)、赤鼯鼠(H. spadiceus)和黑足鼯鼠(H. nigripes)。单变量和多变量分析结果均表明,黑腹鼯鼠不仅可以明显地与菲氏鼯鼠区分开来,而且也明显不同于其他四种鼯鼠。这些结果支持了以下观点:黑腹鼯鼠既不是菲氏鼯鼠的同义词,也不是其亚种,而应被视为一个独特且有效的物种。随后,对东南亚鼯鼠的生物地理学进行的直接讨论,进一步深入了解了该属物种的分化和多样性。不同种类的鼯鼠(Hylopetes)在分类上存在一些差异,特别是关于黑腹鼯鼠(H. electilis)和菲氏鼯鼠(H. phayrei)的系统地位以及它们与其他物种的关系。在本研究中,我们首次汇集了九种鼯鼠中的六种,并对14个可测量的颅骨变量进行了统计分析,总共分析了89个标本,包括黑腹鼯鼠、白颊鼯鼠(H. alboniger)、菲氏鼯鼠、鳞足鼯鼠(H. lepidus)、赤鼯鼠(H. spadiceus)和黑足鼯鼠(H. nigripes)。单变量和多变量分析结果均表明,黑腹鼯鼠不仅可以明显地与菲氏鼯鼠区分开来,而且也明显不同于其他四种鼯鼠。这些结果支持了以下观点:黑腹鼯鼠既不是菲氏鼯鼠的同义词,也不是其亚种,而应被视为一个独特且有效的物种。随后,对东南亚鼯鼠的生物地理学进行的直接讨论,进一步深入了解了该属物种的分化和多样性。