Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;20(10):1026-32. doi: 10.1111/acem.12236.
Expanding insurance coverage is designed to improve access to primary care and reduce use of emergency department (ED) services. Whether expanding coverage achieves this is of paramount importance as the United States prepares for the Affordable Care Act.
Emergency and outpatient department use was examined after the State Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) coverage expansion, focusing on adolescents (a major target group for CHIP) versus young adults (not targeted). The hypothesis was that coverage would increase use of outpatient services, and ED use would decrease.
Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), the years 1992-1996 were analyzed as baseline and then compared to use patterns in 1999-2009, after the CHIP launch. Primary outcomes were population-adjusted annual visits to ED versus nonemergency outpatient settings. Interrupted time series were performed on use rates to ED and outpatient departments between adolescents (11 to 18 years old) and young adults (19 to 29 years old) in the pre-CHIP and CHIP periods. Outpatient-to-ED ratios were calculated and compared across time periods. A stratified analysis by payer and sex was also performed.
The mean number of outpatient adolescent visits increased by 299 visits per 1,000 persons (95% confidence interval [CI] = 140 to 457), while there was no statistically significant increase in young adult outpatient visits across time periods. There was no statistically significant change in the mean number of adolescent ED visits across time periods, while young adult ED use increased by 48 visits per 1,000 persons (95% CI = 24 to 73). The adolescent outpatient-to-ED ratio increased by 1.0 (95% CI = 0.49 to 1.6), while the young adults ratio decreased by 0.53 across time periods (95% CI = -0.90 to -0.16).
Since CHIP, adolescent non-ED outpatient visits have increased, while ED visits have remained unchanged. In comparison to young adults, expanding insurance coverage to adolescents improved use of health care services and suggests a shift to non-ED settings. Expanding insurance through the Affordable Care Act of 2010 will likely increase use of outpatient services, but may not decrease ED volumes.
扩大保险覆盖范围旨在改善初级保健的可及性并减少急诊部(ED)服务的使用。随着美国为平价医疗法案做准备,扩大保险覆盖范围是否能实现这一目标至关重要。
在州儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)覆盖范围扩大后,检查了急诊和门诊部门的使用情况,重点关注青少年(CHIP 的主要目标人群)与年轻成年人(非目标人群)。假设是覆盖范围将增加门诊服务的使用,急诊部的使用将减少。
使用国家门诊医疗保健调查(NAMCS)和国家医院门诊医疗保健调查(NHAMCS),分析了 1992-1996 年作为基线,然后与 1999-2009 年 CHIP 推出后的使用模式进行比较。主要结果是调整人口的每年急诊与非急诊门诊就诊人数。在 CHIP 之前和之后的时期,对青少年(11 至 18 岁)和年轻成年人(19 至 29 岁)的急诊和门诊部门的使用率进行了中断时间序列分析。计算并比较了不同时间段的门诊到急诊的比率。还按付款人和性别进行了分层分析。
每 1000 人中,青少年门诊就诊人数平均增加 299 人次(95%置信区间[CI] = 140 至 457),而同期年轻成年人门诊就诊人数无统计学显著增加。青少年急诊就诊人数在不同时间段内无统计学显著变化,而年轻成年人急诊就诊人数增加 48 人次(95%CI = 24 至 73)。青少年门诊到急诊的比率增加了 1.0(95%CI = 0.49 至 1.6),而年轻成年人的比率在不同时间段内下降了 0.53(95%CI = -0.90 至 -0.16)。
自 CHIP 以来,青少年非急诊门诊就诊人数增加,而急诊就诊人数保持不变。与年轻成年人相比,扩大对青少年的保险覆盖范围增加了医疗服务的使用,并表明向非急诊就诊转移。通过 2010 年平价医疗法案扩大保险范围可能会增加门诊服务的使用,但可能不会减少急诊量。