Suppr超能文献

结构II类基因多态性对血清学特异性概念的影响。

Implication of structural class II gene polymorphism for the concept of serologic specificities.

作者信息

Möller E, Carlsson B, Wallin J

出版信息

Immunol Rev. 1985 Jul;85:107-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1985.tb01132.x.

Abstract

We have used DNA-DNA hybridization methods to study the relationship of genetic polymorphisms to the established HLA-D region determinants as detected with serological reagents. The supertypic determinants DRw52 and 53 are closely associated with a particular RFLP detected with the DR beta probe, but are seemingly encoded by a distinct beta gene compared to the "conventional" DR antigens. DQw1 is closely associated with a DQ alpha chain polymorphism, whereas the DQw2 and 3 specificities have correlations to RFLP using the DQ beta probe. Additional DQ polymorphism, in linkage disequilibrium with DR but yet without a serological counterpart is also described. Considering the finding that there exist a varying number of DR beta genes in different DR haplotypes (Böhme et al. 1985), from 1 in DRw8 to 3 (or 4) in DR4- and DR7-positive cells, we have made a tentative re-evaluation of the genetic basis for the conventional DR specificities. The combination of cell surface antigens encoded by DR and DQ loci are believed to form the basis for MLC stimulating determinants. We have speculated that a combination of determinants encoded by distinct DR beta genes and in certain instances additional DQ polymorphism is responsible for the DR types. Thus, only a limited variability is observed after DNA-DNA hybridization using DR beta probes. Only DR1-, 2- and 4-positive cells have distinct bands not detected in any other haplotypes, whereas DR3, 5, w6, and w8 can be characterized by a combination of bands, which is the result of hybridization with several DR beta genes. Furthermore, we have suggested that the difference between the DR3 and DRw6 specificities is due to variability with regard to 1 DQ beta gene, and have also made the assumption that DRw6 cells may express a lower concentration of DR locus encoded products compared to DR3-positive cells (Haziot et al. 1985). In addition, we have discussed the genetic basis for so-called DR blanks, implying that an unorthodox combination of DR and DQ determinants forms the basis for difficulties in assigning DR types to such cells in some cases and that "blanks" can be associated with low expression at the cell surface of well-known DR determinants. The use of cDNA and genomic probes for distinct class II genes to elucidate the mechanisms of HLA and disease association has been documented and discussed.

摘要

我们采用DNA-DNA杂交方法,研究了遗传多态性与用血清学试剂检测到的已确定的HLA-D区域决定簇之间的关系。超型决定簇DRw52和53与用DRβ探针检测到的特定限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)密切相关,但与“传统”DR抗原相比,似乎由一个不同的β基因编码。DQw1与DQα链多态性密切相关,而DQw2和3特异性与使用DQβ探针的RFLP相关。还描述了与DR处于连锁不平衡状态但尚无血清学对应物的其他DQ多态性。考虑到不同DR单倍型中存在不同数量的DRβ基因(Böhme等人,1985年)这一发现,从DRw8中的1个到DR4和DR7阳性细胞中的3个(或4个),我们对传统DR特异性的遗传基础进行了初步重新评估。DR和DQ基因座编码的细胞表面抗原的组合被认为是混合淋巴细胞培养(MLC)刺激决定簇的基础。我们推测,由不同DRβ基因编码的决定簇组合,以及在某些情况下额外的DQ多态性,是造成DR类型的原因。因此,使用DRβ探针进行DNA-DNA杂交后,仅观察到有限的变异性。只有DR1、2和4阳性细胞具有在任何其他单倍型中未检测到的独特条带,而DR3、5、w6和w8可以通过条带组合来表征,这是与多个DRβ基因杂交的结果。此外,我们提出DR3和DRw6特异性之间的差异是由于1个DQβ基因的变异性,并且还假设与DR3阳性细胞相比,DRw6细胞可能表达较低浓度的DR基因座编码产物(Haziot等人,1985年)。此外,我们还讨论了所谓DR空白的遗传基础,这意味着DR和DQ决定簇的非正统组合是某些情况下难以将DR类型指定给此类细胞的原因,并且“空白”可能与知名DR决定簇在细胞表面的低表达有关。已记录并讨论了使用针对不同II类基因的cDNA和基因组探针来阐明HLA与疾病关联的机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验