Authors' Affiliation: Department of Microbiology, Immunobiology and Genetics, University of Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Vienna, Austria.
Cancer Res. 2013 Dec 1;73(23):6926-37. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0748. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
RAF inhibitors achieve unprecedented but mainly transient clinical responses in patients with melanoma whose tumors harbor an activating BRAF mutation. One notable side-effect of RAF inhibitors is the stimulation of cutaneous skin tumors, arising in about 30% of patients receiving these drugs, which are thought to develop as a result of inhibitor-induced activation of wild-type Raf in occult precursor skin lesions. This effect raises the possibility that less manageable tumors might also arise in other epithelial tissues. Here we provide preclinical evidence supporting this disquieting hypothesis by showing that the RAF inhibitors PLX-4032 (vemurafenib) and GDC-0879 precipitate the development of cell-autonomous, Ras-driven tumors in skin and gastric epithelia. The magnitude of the effects correlated with the inhibitors' relative abilities to induce ERK activation. Epidermis-restricted ablation of either B-Raf or C-Raf prevented PLX-4032-induced ERK activation and tumorigenesis. In contrast, GDC-0879 induced ERK activation and tumorigenesis in B-Raf-deficient epidermis, whereas C-Raf ablation blocked GDC-0879-induced tumorigenesis (despite strong ERK activation) by preventing Rokα-mediated keratinocyte dedifferentiation. Thus, inhibitor-induced ERK activation did not require a specific Raf kinase. ERK activation was necessary, but not sufficient for Ras + Raf inhibitor-induced tumorigenesis, whereas C-Raf downregulation of Rokα was essential even in the face of sustained ERK signaling to prevent differentiation and promote tumorigenesis. Taken together, our findings suggest that combination therapies targeting ERK-dependent and -independent functions of Raf may be more efficient but also safer for cancer treatment.
RAF 抑制剂在携带激活 BRAF 突变的黑色素瘤患者中实现了前所未有的但主要是短暂的临床反应。RAF 抑制剂的一个显著副作用是刺激皮肤肿瘤,大约 30%接受这些药物治疗的患者会出现这种情况,人们认为这些肿瘤是由于抑制剂诱导潜伏皮肤病变中野生型 Raf 的激活而发展起来的。这种效应提出了一种可能性,即其他上皮组织中也可能出现更难控制的肿瘤。在这里,我们通过提供临床前证据支持了这一令人不安的假说,表明 RAF 抑制剂 PLX-4032(vemurafenib)和 GDC-0879 促使皮肤和胃上皮中的细胞自主性 Ras 驱动肿瘤的发展。这些影响的程度与抑制剂诱导 ERK 激活的相对能力相关。B-Raf 或 C-Raf 的表皮特异性消融可防止 PLX-4032 诱导的 ERK 激活和肿瘤发生。相比之下,GDC-0879 在 B-Raf 缺陷型表皮中诱导 ERK 激活和肿瘤发生,而 C-Raf 消融通过阻止 Rokα 介导的角质形成细胞去分化来阻止 GDC-0879 诱导的肿瘤发生(尽管 ERK 激活强烈)。因此,抑制剂诱导的 ERK 激活不需要特定的 Raf 激酶。ERK 激活对于 Ras+Raf 抑制剂诱导的肿瘤发生是必要的,但不是充分的,而 C-Raf 下调 Rokα 即使在持续的 ERK 信号下也是必不可少的,以防止分化并促进肿瘤发生。总之,我们的研究结果表明,针对 Raf 的 ERK 依赖性和非依赖性功能的联合治疗可能对癌症治疗更有效但也更安全。