Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, , Museum of Comparative Zoology, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, , Apartado 0843-03092, Panama City, Balboa, Colon, Panama.
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 16;280(1772):20132245. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2245. Print 2013 Dec 7.
Cooperatively breeding animals live in social groups in which some individuals help to raise the offspring of others, often at the expense of their own reproduction. Kin selection--when individuals increase their inclusive fitness by aiding genetic relatives--is a powerful explanation for the evolution of cooperative breeding, particularly because most groups consist of family members. However, recent molecular studies have revealed that many cooperative groups also contain unrelated immigrants, and the processes responsible for the formation and maintenance of non-kin coalitions are receiving increasing attention. Here, I provide the first systematic review of group structure for all 213 species of cooperatively breeding birds for which data are available. Although the majority of species (55%) nest in nuclear family groups, cooperative breeding by unrelated individuals is more common than previously recognized: 30% nest in mixed groups of relatives and non-relatives, and 15% nest primarily with non-relatives. Obligate cooperative breeders are far more likely to breed with non-kin than are facultative cooperators, indicating that when constraints on independent breeding are sufficiently severe, the direct benefits of group membership can substitute for potential kin-selected benefits. I review three patterns of dispersal that give rise to social groups with low genetic relatedness, and I discuss the selective pressures that favour the formation of such groups. Although kin selection has undoubtedly been crucial to the origin of most avian social systems, direct benefits have subsequently come to play a predominant role in some societies, allowing cooperation to persist despite low genetic relatedness.
合作繁殖动物生活在社会群体中,其中一些个体帮助抚养其他个体的后代,通常是以牺牲自己的繁殖为代价。亲缘选择——当个体通过帮助遗传亲属来增加其包容性适合度时——是合作繁殖进化的一个强有力解释,尤其是因为大多数群体由家庭成员组成。然而,最近的分子研究表明,许多合作群体中也包含无亲缘关系的移民,负责形成和维持非亲缘关系联盟的过程越来越受到关注。在这里,我对所有 213 种有合作繁殖行为的鸟类的群体结构进行了首次系统综述,这些鸟类的数据都是可用的。尽管大多数物种(55%)在核心家庭群体中筑巢,但无亲缘关系个体的合作繁殖比以前认识到的更为普遍:30%在有亲属和无亲属的混合群体中筑巢,15%主要与无亲属一起筑巢。强制性合作繁殖者与非亲属繁殖的可能性远远大于偶然合作繁殖者,这表明当独立繁殖的约束足够严重时,群体成员的直接利益可以替代潜在的亲缘选择利益。我回顾了三种导致遗传关系较低的社会群体形成的扩散模式,并讨论了有利于形成这种群体的选择压力。虽然亲缘选择无疑对大多数鸟类社会系统的起源至关重要,但在某些社会中,直接利益随后发挥了主要作用,允许合作在遗传关系较低的情况下持续存在。