Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, MN.
Urology. 2013 Dec;82(6):1211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.074. Epub 2013 Oct 19.
To study the use of a baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination in men (aged 40-49 years) in predicting long-term prostate cancer risk in a prospectively followed, representative population cohort.
Since 1990, a random sample of men in Olmsted County (aged 40-49 years) has been followed up prospectively (n = 268), with biennial visits, including a urologic questionnaire, PSA screening, and physical examination. The ensuing risk of prostate cancer (CaP) was compared using survival analyses.
Median follow-up was 16.3 years (interquartile range 14.0-17.3, max 19.1). For men with a baseline PSA <1.0 ng/mL (n = 195), the risk of subsequent Gleason 6 CaP diagnosis by 55 years was 0.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0%-1.7%) and 15.7% (95% CI 6.5%-24.9%) for men with a baseline PSA ≥ 1.0 ng/mL. No man with a low baseline PSA developed an intermediate or high risk CaP, whereas 2.6% of men with a higher baseline PSA did (95% CI 0.58%-4.6%).
Men (aged 40-49 years) can be stratified with a baseline PSA. If it is below 1.0 ng/mL, there is very little risk for developing a lethal CaP, and as many as 75% of men might be able to avoid additional PSA screening until 55 years. Conversely, men aged 40-49 years with a baseline PSA level >1.0 ng/mL had a significant risk of CaP diagnosis and should be monitored more closely.
研究基线前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和直肠指检在预测前瞻性随访的代表性人群队列中 40-49 岁男性的长期前列腺癌风险中的作用。
自 1990 年以来,奥姆斯特德县(年龄 40-49 岁)的男性随机样本进行了前瞻性随访(n=268),每两年进行一次访问,包括泌尿科问卷、PSA 筛查和体格检查。使用生存分析比较随后发生前列腺癌(CaP)的风险。
中位随访时间为 16.3 年(四分位距 14.0-17.3,最大 19.1)。对于基线 PSA<1.0ng/mL 的男性(n=195),到 55 岁时诊断为 Gleason 6 CaP 的风险为 0.6%(95%置信区间 0%-1.7%),而基线 PSA≥1.0ng/mL 的男性风险为 15.7%(95%置信区间 6.5%-24.9%)。没有基线 PSA 较低的男性发展为中危或高危 CaP,而基线 PSA 较高的男性中有 2.6%(95%置信区间 0.58%-4.6%)发展为高危 CaP。
可以根据基线 PSA 对男性(年龄 40-49 岁)进行分层。如果低于 1.0ng/mL,则发生致命性 CaP 的风险很小,多达 75%的男性可能能够避免在 55 岁之前进行额外的 PSA 筛查。相反,基线 PSA 水平>1.0ng/mL 的 40-49 岁男性发生 CaP 诊断的风险显著增加,应更密切监测。