When love hurts children: controlling the feelings of minors.
作者信息
Epright M Carmela, Waller Sara
机构信息
a Furman University.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(11):28-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.839754.
PMID:24161176
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
When love hurts children: controlling the feelings of minors.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(11):28-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.839754.
2
A Thomistic account of anti-love biotechnology.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(11):30-1. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.839753.
3
The difficult case of voluntariness as autonomy in anti-love biotechnology.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(11):1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.850918.
4
The vice of in-principlism and the harmfulness of love.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(11):19-21. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.839769.
5
Involuntary exposures to love-enhancing or anti-love agents.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(11):26-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.839758.
6
Anti-love biotechnology: was it not better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all?
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(11):22-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.839770.
7
Anti-love biotechnologies: integrating considerations of the social.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(11):18-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.839771.
8
Amantes sunt amentes: pathologizing love and the meaning of suffering.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(11):34-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.839759.
9
Anti-love or anti-"lifestyle": historical reflections on reparative therapies for homosexuality.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(11):36-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.840869.
10
An error theory of biotechnology and the ethics of chemical breakups: it is the reasons, not the pharmaceuticals, that are important in defending against perilous love.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(11):32-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.839762.
引用本文的文献
1
The medicalization of love.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015 Jul;24(3):323-36. doi: 10.1017/S0963180114000206. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
Zotero 插件