Mitchell Michael S, Koen Clifford M, Moore Thomas W
Author Affiliations: Fisher & Phillips LLP New Orleans, Louisiana (Mr Mitchell); Department of Management and Marketing, East Tennessee State University, University Avenue, Johnson City, Tennessee (Mr Koen); and Department of Management and Marketing, East Tennessee State University (Dr Moore).
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2013 Oct-Dec;32(4):294-302. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e3182a9d878.
As more and more individuals choose to express themselves and their religious beliefs with headwear, jewelry, dress, tattoos, and body piercings and push the envelope on what is deemed appropriate in the workplace, employers have an increased need for creation and enforcement of reasonable dress codes and appearance policies. As with any employment policy or practice, an appearance policy must be implemented and enforced without regard to an individual's race, color, sex, national origin, religion, disability, age, or any other protected status. A policy governing dress and appearance based on the business needs of an employer that is applied fairly and consistently and does not have a disproportionate effect on any protected class will generally be upheld if challenged in court. By examining some of the more common legal challenges to dress codes and how courts have resolved the disputes, health care managers can avoid many potential problems. This article addresses the issue of religious discrimination focusing on dress and appearance and some of the court cases that provide guidance for employers.
随着越来越多的人选择通过佩戴头饰、珠宝、穿着打扮、纹身和身体穿刺来表达自己及其宗教信仰,不断突破职场中被视为得体的界限,雇主愈发需要制定并执行合理的着装规范和外表政策。与任何就业政策或做法一样,外表政策的实施和执行不得考虑个人的种族、肤色、性别、国籍、宗教、残疾、年龄或任何其他受保护身份。基于雇主业务需求制定的着装和外表政策,若能公平、一致地适用,且对任何受保护群体没有不成比例的影响,通常在法庭受到质疑时会得到支持。通过审视对着装规范的一些较为常见的法律质疑以及法院如何解决这些争议,医疗保健管理人员可以避免许多潜在问题。本文探讨宗教歧视问题,重点关注着装和外表,以及一些为雇主提供指导的法庭案例。