Hamedy Reza, Shakiba Bita, Fayazi Sara, Pak Jacklyn G, White Shane N
UCLA School of Dentistry, CA, USA.
Iran Endod J. 2013 Fall;8(4):197-204. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
Root canal treatment (RCT) success criteria inform us of the path to bony healing and of prognostic factors, but tell little about how the patient perceives, feels, or values RCT. Patients choose, undergo, and pay for RCT, they live with the result, and inform their community. The purpose of this narrative review was to appraise patient-centered outcomes of initial non-surgical RCT and nonsurgical retreatment, in adults.
Patient-centered RCT outcome themes were identified in the extant literature: quality of life, satisfaction, anxiety, fear, pain, tooth survival and cost. Narrative review was applied because the disparate themes and data were unsuited to systematic review or meta-analysis.
Application of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) demonstrated that disease of pulpal origin affects quality of life with moderate severity, primarily through physical pain and psychological discomfort, and that RCT results in broad improvement of quality of life. Satisfaction with RCT is extremely high, but cost is the primary reason for dissatisfaction. Anxiety and fear affect RCT patients, profoundly influencing their behaviors, including treatment avoidance, and their pain experience. Fear of pain is "fair" to "very much" prior to RCT. Pain is widely feared, disliked, and remembered; however, disease of pulpal origin generally produces moderate, but not severe pain. RCT causes a dramatic decrease in pain prevalence and severity over the week following treatment. Survival rates of teeth after RCT are very high; complication rates are low. Cost is a barrier to RCT, but initial costs, lifetime costs, cost effectiveness, cost utility, and cost benefit all compare extremely well to the alternatives involving replacement using implants or fixed prostheses.
Dentists must strive to reduce anxiety, fear, experienced and remembered pain, and to accurately inform and educate their patients with respect to technical, practical and psychosocial aspects of RCT.
根管治疗(RCT)的成功标准为我们提供了骨愈合的途径和预后因素,但对于患者如何看待、感受或评价根管治疗却知之甚少。患者选择、接受并为根管治疗付费,他们承受治疗结果,并告知其周围的人。本叙述性综述的目的是评估成人初次非手术根管治疗和非手术再治疗以患者为中心的结果。
在现有文献中确定了以患者为中心的根管治疗结果主题:生活质量、满意度、焦虑、恐惧、疼痛、牙齿留存率和成本。采用叙述性综述,因为不同的主题和数据不适合进行系统综述或荟萃分析。
口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP)的应用表明,牙髓源性疾病对生活质量有中度严重影响,主要通过身体疼痛和心理不适,而根管治疗可使生活质量得到广泛改善。对根管治疗的满意度极高,但成本是不满的主要原因。焦虑和恐惧影响根管治疗患者,深刻影响他们的行为,包括逃避治疗,以及他们的疼痛体验。在根管治疗前,对疼痛的恐惧为“一般”到“非常严重”。疼痛普遍令人恐惧、厌恶且令人记忆深刻;然而,牙髓源性疾病通常产生中度而非重度疼痛。根管治疗使治疗后一周内疼痛发生率和严重程度大幅下降。根管治疗后牙齿的留存率非常高;并发症发生率低。成本是根管治疗的一个障碍,但初始成本、终身成本、成本效益、成本效用和成本收益与使用种植体或固定修复体替代的其他选择相比都非常有利。
牙医必须努力减少焦虑、恐惧、实际经历和记忆中的疼痛,并就根管治疗的技术、实际和心理社会方面准确地告知和教育患者。